Recent content by Knuffeldraak

As I said, I failed to notice the other page that explains a lot of the similar info.

My bad, I thought the section on firearms ended on p267, didn't see it followed on the second page afterwards. But no I was referring to the Fighter (Gunslinger) page that came out end '15 / begin '16

I'm talking about the entire roster of weapons, as well as certain feats that supports firearms, and additive sets of rules and interactions related to Firearms. The DMG only 'very openly, shortly and vaguely' talks about firearms, for a narrative on 'what ammunition', and 'shoot X times before...

As for the artist, Google; "Strixhaven Crux of Fate stolen art". You'll find that no legal action was it could be taken, only a terminations over immorality. As for UA and 4th edition, this literally was mentioned in the posts right above you? But for an example; Firearms weapons + feat Support...

Yes and no. The OGL protects you from takedowns like that, as they give you permission to share and use their stuff (unless you break those the terms). They're also not saying anywhere "this is mine now". They're saying; "it's yours, but you've given us permission to use and share it." Whether...

They've also done this in 4th Edition, as well as on the MtG side in terms of Artwork for their cards.

Shrug It's been there for a very long time. Two years ago it was brought to attention a lot when some players in the MtG community noticed that some fan-art was used in a newly released card. The community was outraged and the artist was temporarily suspended for not coordinating this decision...

Hi! Thanks for your patience on explaining this. Yes, I fully understand now that, when making Derivative Works, you are allowed to copy-right the Changes that you make from said work (but not the content that you've drawn the source material of). So in that regard, I do see the point where...

The Original Post says; - both the original work and any Derivative Works of it are protected by the same copyright And - you can't copyright I'll have to read on that tomorrow. 2 am is late enough.

Except it's not an Original Work if it's based or derived off another work. That's where the pitfall is.

Look the Original Post of this thread...

It doesn't matter. I'm just asking you to not jump the gun pointing fingers about purposely ignoring something when I wasn't even replying to the something you say I ignored. Accusing someone out of the blue is simply rude, and I'm not sure why politely and calmly explaining my boundaries takes...

Completely unrelated at this point. I simply and politely ask you not to jump the gun to me like that. Do you understand me?

Can't cancel something I never had. Roll20 has been perfect enough to host and play D&D on.

I'm astounded that right as they start to explain the definitions, he just simply takes 'Work' as definition, and not 'Original Work'//'Derivative Work', both of which have very important differences here. Original Works can be protected by copyright, while Derivative Works cannot.