Recent content by M.Handy

Yes, but I can never leave well enough alone, and I think this adds a bit more flavor.

I created this prestige class because I have a passion for electricity. Starting with the Pyrokinetisist, I attempted to bring it more in line with the Complete Psionic prestige classes by blending in a few attributes from the Storm Disciple and changing the overall attribute to electric. I...

I agree. They do seem interesting, but some seem more like feats to me.

This idea came to me on two accounts. I have a player in my current campaign who likes to manipulate plants, and my asking myself why the kineticist PRC should be limited to fire, ice, electricity, or sonics. Thus the Chlorokineticist was born. While it bears some resemblance to the...

A bit, I suppose. Only without the offensive powers.

Thanks for the suggestions! Here's the Prescience Warrior as he stands now. I added another level of skills, rearranged them a bit, gave them a bit more flavor, and added some more augmentation. Table The Prescience Warrior Base Power Level Attack Fort Ref Will Points/...

This is an idea I've been toying with. It is basically a blending of the Psychic Warrior and the Rogue, making it a sort of alternate build for either. However, the skills and powers available are mostly defensive (precognitive) abilities. Thus the result is sort of a Psy Warrior with better...

Help me here. Why?

Sounds interesting. Are you still looking for players?

Sounds interesting.

A Wilder is already very much like a Psion. I'm afraid that mixing the two like you did produces nothing specifically unique, and only gives you the best of both classes without their weaknesses.

I will point out that the "Anyone but a Fighter or Barbarian" clause does not preclude having levels in those classes. You need levels in other classes as well is all. It also does not stop a Paladin or Psychic Warrior from taking this PrC. Actually, I bet a Soulknife would make a killer Time...

Actually, I decided to just remove it.

Now that you mention it, I agree about Time Regression. I'll see about replacing it.

gotcha. thanks