Recent content by Maxperson

Heh. I just pulled up an image and started modifying it just to see. It can follow instruction as I have been saying. However.... 1. It takes a good amount of time to make the image with the instructed change. 2. There's a limit to the number of images I can make per day. I could do what I...

Not really. Control vs. no control isn't made up by me. I can enter a prompt and just let an AI run wild, having no control. Or I can take an image, even one not supplied by the AI, and then spend hours and hours, changing hundreds or even thousands of details via the AI tool, and have total...

Sure it does. "By promoting chaos and evil, those of this alignment hope to bring themselves to positions of power, glory, and prestige in a system ruled by individual caprice and their own whims." There's no thought behind caprice and whim. Here's the 5e version. "Chaotic evil (CE)...

This False Dichotomy is false. I do not need to know how to draw a picture in order to tell(not ask) the AI to make the changes that I can envision. The final result will not at all be the original picture, but will be a very different picture that I envisioned and created.

A prompt yields something outside of your control. Direction yields something within your control. I suppose we could call both prompts, but it would get confusing because control over the result is what makes all the difference.

It's what the alignment has been from the outset. It's might makes right. The Joker or the Kurgan(from the Highlander) are perfect examples of Chaotic Evil. They aren't going to shy away from doing what they want when they want to do it. Edit: Here is the 1e description. "By promoting chaos...

What I am talking about is the same as computer programming. I am directing the AI tool through many, many, MANY lines of language to produce an image that is my vision. A computer programmer directs the computer tool through, many, many, MANY lines of language to produce an image that is his...

There really is no smart way to play Chaotic Evil in my opinion, because it's a Might Makes Right alignment. It's the Joker or Kurgan. Or the guy who will shoot you because you have boots that he wants and he can do it. Once you introduce thought into the equation and the person doesn't do X...

Littlefinger wasn't Chaotic Evil. He was Lawful Evil.

That's false. There are no prompts. There is DIRECTION to alter the picture AS I CHOOSE. A prompt is just, "Hey AI, go out and find me X." No it won't. Why? Because my vision is what will be the result. If the AI is influenced by something other than me, the result will not be my vision...

My second post in the thread described a portion of the process. Enough that you could apply it to the other parts of the picture to understand what I am saying.

If you believe that, you aren't understanding what I am saying, because the final result of what I am describing is 1) a picture that is not like the original, and 2) isn't the result of a prompt or prompts to AI to go fetch images. It's purely the vision of the artist who has changed the...

It does help you make the thing as a tool that allows you to achieve your vision when you don't have the talent to draw it yourself. An automated tool moving at the direction of the creator is still just a tool to help the creator achieve his goal. AI is useful in the process for providing a...

I figured that since a photocopied picture and a created picture are both pictures, the example should both be animals. :p

Because that's not an option. It is creative, because something new is being created by the human with the vision. Which is about as far from what I am describing as a bird is from a monkey.