Recent content by Maxperson

Humans aren't being educated by that use, though. The IP is being used to create a better functioning AI for profit.

Says the frog person!

That's not the only way to use AI, though. You can reduce AI to just being a tool to create art, just like a paintbrush is a tool for creating art. It's far more in depth than just using a prompt to get it to give you a picture.

I'm not aware of any of the fair use exceptions that would apply to AI.

"There seems to be a fundamental difference of opinion about whether the underlying creative intent or the human assembly of pixels is art. I think art is when pixels get created in response to human creative intent. You think that it's only art when you have the human creative intent and the...

I think it is. They are taking images that don't belong to them and then using those images for monetary gain. That's flat out an unethical use of intellectual property that they don't own.

Maybe I'm just more detailed than you are with what I envision, or I'm much harder to please, because I've never seen a picture that perfectly matched my vision of anything. Cool. I'd never say that, either. Nothing I'm discussing here is about taking an image given to me by the AI and saying...

:rolleyes:

And that's why YOUR labor would be AI slop I guess. That isn't what I would do and is not what I am describing. Also, let's be clear, I've repeatedly said that I don't do AI art myself, so I don't want credit, respect or money. I'm just pointing out how AI can be used as a tool to make art...

It only leads there if you put blinders on and ignore all the other stuff that goes into it. Your False Dichotomy/Slippery Slope/Strawman there is false, slippery and a complete twisting of all of my arguments here. Getting three fallacies into one sentence is quite impressive.

Apparently you don't realize it can take hours, perhaps many hours to get to your vision through directing the AI. Quite a lot of work is involved, so yes I would be giving MY creativity, as it's my vision, and also MY labor, since it would take hours to complete. Are you going get past the...

Not really. I am fully aware that the first prompt causes AI to grab from artists and am against using that art as it would be theft. That said, if I then change it radically(I'm not talking about small things like shading and color) such that it is no longer that artists creation and is...

There was no gaslighting dude. Mecheon took FrogReaver's quote out of context and then responded with a competely inappropriate response. The sentence immediately preceding the one taken out of context shows that the context is, "When does pixelated art become art?" Then the next sentence was...

No. I get the initial picture back based on whatever prompt I have given. Then I direct it as a tool to make the many, many changes I want. That's instruction. There's no way that it can go out and keep finding art on the internet that has all the changes I want to make to the initial...

It can't be anything else. I had a vision. My vision is now before me. That's 100% my vision. You don't get to tell me how much I would tweak it. I guarantee you it wouldn't be a little. There's no way the AI would get all that close to my vision with what it first grabbed. It would take...