Recent content by Mr. Lahey

  1. Mr. Lahey

    D&D 4E D&D online

    Never played it, but I heard Solasta is good. https://www.solasta-game.com/
  2. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    Tolkien is clearly a “base” literature informing our view of D&D and similar RPGs, but a better example of creatures that seem to have a biological basis for their behaviour and way of thinking might be the creatures from Ringworld (Pierson’s Puppeteers, Kzin and others). The biological...
  3. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    Sure, but according to Tolkien there’s nothing biological to it:
  4. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    For sure, though this argues against the notion of “racial” resistance or vulnerability.
  5. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    It’s an interesting point, but IMO this is literary criticism and I see limited value in using any of this to set the statistics or traits in an RPG.
  6. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    We don’t know the ring could turn either Galdalf or Galadriel, though they each feared that would be the result. If killing one’s friend within minutes of coming near the ring isn’t immediate corruption, then you have I have fundamental differences in our definition of corruption that makes...
  7. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    You don’t consider Smeagol to have been corrupted immediately? Anyway, you can interpret what you have read however you see fit - according to the totality of Tolkien’s world, they are basically the same, aside from being smaller and larger.
  8. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    Not according to Tolkien’s legendarium- they are a type of human and have no special resistance.
  9. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    I’d say any essentially immortal group (i.e. the elves) would have a very different outlook on life compared to mortal beings. Might different creatures not look on the perspectives of others and assign morality to these tendencies?
  10. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    I suppose none of it is undeniable, the the alternative is the ‘humans with funny ears’ model.
  11. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    I don’t disagree, but the vast majority of players/creators are not experts in fish (or insects, or birds). For good or bad, I would still expect most of us to base our RPG ideas on a simplistic (read: inaccurate) view of the real world biology of such creatures. To your second point, why...
  12. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    I agree, but that’s the issue, IMO. Making them act differently is left up to the player, which means that it will vary from group to group and player to player. Without guidelines written in the game itself there will be no way to ensure even a basic consistency. Putting aside the physical...
  13. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    Interesting, but when I look at age, I think of different things. I cannot imagine that longevity would not change how you think of the world.
  14. Mr. Lahey

    I don't get the arguments for bioessentialism

    This, to me, is the real problem. Modern humans have no real world experience with sentient creatures with radically different physical or mental characteristics. Therefore, anytime we try to consider how halflings vs elves vs goliaths vs thri-kreen would be physically different, and how we...
  15. Mr. Lahey

    D&D General When We Were Wizards: Review of the Completed Podcast!

    Perhaps the best way to look at it is that TSR developed more and more interesting, imaginative games through the 80s and 90s despite the executive structure of the company.
Top