Neonchameleon's latest activity

Because you want to play with specific people, perhaps for themselves, perhaps because you know they'll bring things to the game that...

Quite the reverse. Races are part of how players get to personalise their characters. They are more intimately connected with the parts...

It's barely a trade-off. There are only about three hours in a session. And with K and that group I can either have a mediocre tactical...

Meanwhile for me what I get by actively letting everyone create is never what I want and is 90% of the time actively better than what...

I was thinking about this thread cycling home yesterday evening, and was puzzled by what seems to be an assumption made in many of the...

So there's a lot of chat in the thread about player vs. gm, and the player's right to add to lore vs the gm's right to resist other...

The notion that there is some sort of trade off between player and GM enjoyment of the game - on some posited spectrum from "dancing...

I'm sorry to hear that, but ironically the only time I've seen it matters in play for one of the "classic Tolkien races" is with a dwarf...

I'm not even sure what this is anyway. There's something really fun about a player going "oh heck, your questions and framing took me...

We still haven't given a reason why RenleyRenfield exists. Or for that matter Neonchameleon. Indeed the only person round here who is in...

Just to put things into perspective I'm simultaneously running two Daggerheart games right now for two groups with no one else in common...

Yes, absolutely! You'll always get more interesting ideas by brain storming with others.

It's not lazy, it's proactively seeking stakeholder input.

Also entertaining to see where they go with it, I like being surprised.

I do not mean offense by this, but adults have trouble having adult conversations all the time. I have to say someone who has not seen...