Recent content by Nikosandros

More races = more options; that's good in my book (BTW, why we still don't have dog and bear folk??). I like to have a wide palette from which I can pick and choose. As I wrote in some other thread, my Greyhawk campaign has only the "traditional" AD&D races available, meanwhile my FR game in...

Yes, this has been confirmed: https://www.enworld.org/threads/paizo-launches-community-content-program.682721/#post-8400660

I have a copy preordered from Noble Knight. It has yet to ship and then it will have to make its way across the ocean and clear customs... too bad there isn't any electronic version.

This is shaping up to be a wild thread.

I can't. Maybe it's not available in the EU?

I am :)

Yes, but it is still excessive. Even if you don't pump up CON, DR 10-12 is very high. P.S. I'm assuming you are talking about D&D 5e. The thread is tagged AD&D 2e, though.

I'm perplexed by the fact that one of the driving elements of D&D products was: Competitive. What did they mean by that?

"You wouldn't worry so much about what others think of you if you realized how seldom they do." - Eleanore Roosevelt

It is possible to add custom monsters to D&D Beyond, even though the process is somewhat tedious, especially if you want to make the attacks "rollable" in the encounter tracker.

Yes, they are distinct conditions. For example, a ghost is "normally" ethereal and it can't attack on Material Plane, but when it manifests then it becomes uncorporeal and can attack with ghost touch weapons.

This always perplexed me and it lead me to add a sixth save category: Traps or Mishaps.

One small float for a flumph, one giant levitation for flumphkind.

Those games are not developed by WotC, so I don't think that they will be related to the development of D&D.

Yes, it was different - earlier - era. This should be the "standard" Talislanta setting, but with 5e rules.