Recent content by pemerton

Which is basically the opposite of organic!

I'm not an actor, and no one whom I play with is a thespian, voice actor or other sort of performer. But social resolution mechanics have reliably produced strong social scenes. And the more robust mechanics of more "modern" games have done so better: the Rolemaster influence and interaction...

Yeah, the suggestion that the damage/hit point systems is just an afterthought - that beating a Pit Fiend in combat is just a modest mechanical variant on climbing a cliff - is pretty odd.

I've never played BitD, and don't know it super-well, but thought I'd have a look at what the rules say about clocks: Progress Clocks | Blades in the Dark RPG This seems like it's relevant to the current conversation: Remember that a clock tracks progress. It reflects the fictional situation...

Rolling a d20 for success/fail, and rolling a d20 to see whether I get to roll damage to ablate an opponent's hit points, are not the same resolution mode. Suppose that the swim from an island to shore, through a raging storm, is DC 20. The 15th level PC with 20 STR and Athletics training has a...

Metagaming!

Here's a simple example: In Burning Wheel and Torchbearer 2e, if the consequence for a character is death, but the player of that character has a Persona point, then the player can spend the point and declare "I have the will to live". And then the PC doesn't die: rather, they survive but...

I find D&D combat too limiting of my agency. The GM keeps telling me, "the Orc deftly stabs in under your shield and . . " and I'm all like "Hang on, how come I'm not allowed to move my shield down to block their blow?"

I don't know if it helps at all to frame it as an ethical rather than moral choice (using "ethical" in the sense of pertaining to the living of a good life, as opposed to "moral" in the sense of satisfying the duties one owes to others). And so with the example of Keeler and the young sentry...

I've read, and re-read, that example. Rising conflict across a moral line: as you say, the ugly choice isn't about the player's priorities for the character, but the GM's priorities for prompting the player to reveal the truth about Keeler - ie she's a ruthless killer. Presumably a permissible...

Is the conflict trigger the connected part, or the connecting part? That is, the bridge between set-up and consequence. Let me spell out your elaboration of Harper's example: MC: OK, so you sneak into the garage but there's Plover right there, about to notice you any second now. What do you...

I've always found it a bit strange that the differentiation between classes would be found in the mechanics of action economy and resource recovery, rather than in what a character of that class can actually do. When I read someone saying that they'd rather be rid of bonus actions, I don't think...

I dunno - when I walked out of the theatre where that film was just playing, I overheard the other patrons saying "That was too abstractly mechanical for my taste."

I'm waiting for the next post!

Building on what @Campbell has said, and also what I posted upthread: if the principal focus of play - as far as story/theme is concerned - is the event or situation that the GM has authored, then I don't think we have "play to find out" in the Apocalypse World sense. I mean, a classic D&D...