SpellObjectEnthusiast's latest activity

I think you are entirely discounting your knowledge of the system and its workings in comparison to the average player. None of this was...

This isn't for you to proclaim. Copyright, etc., are all complex legal constructs and there are legal cases going through about these...

I didn't think I needed Shadowdark, but with 5.24e being even more high magic and cool powers than 5e I needed something more grounded...

Honestly, 5e is a part of the style that began with 3e and it really contains Pathfinder, M&M and a bunch of similar modern RPGs.

I really hate that 5e is kind of described as being its own play style when we’re really just talking about a particular system.

No one is talking about making Shadowdark heartbreakers.

I think the KS has now exceeded Kelsey's KS for the game itself.

Well, no, he is affected because I am angry. If I wasn't angry, I'd buy things, because Numenera is cool AF.

This actually bothers me. Like I said, I'm an Open Gaming purist. If you made a game based on stuff you didn't own,you shouldn't be...

My point is emphasizing that Shadowdark does not have an Open License, and that it is far more restrictive than many other games in the...

So, if this comes out in December 2025, that means I can run my 5E 2024 game through the end of the year and I bet by then folks will be...

....Which is something that doesn't require a license to do. Thats a supplement, not a derivative game. Open Game Licenses allow you...

I think the thing it lets you do is put a Shadowdark compatibility logo on your adventure or supplement -- which, to be fair, IS...

It makes me angry enough that I won't buy anything from them.

You don't need a license to claim compatibility with a game system. You only need it if you want to use the specific logos that...