tetrasodium's latest activity
-
tetrasodium reacted to Scribe's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with
Like.
Yeah I'm not on there, have no idea how that all works. -
tetrasodium reacted to DavyGreenwind's post in the thread Eberron: Forge of the Artificer to Be Priced at $29.99 with Like.
There's some clues about page size from some of the page previews. Chapter 1 is the Artificer, and Chapter 2 (character options) starts...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2024) Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently?.You made the anecdotal claim about GM's you've encountered, the plural of anecdote is not data...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Henadic Theologian's post in the thread Eberron: Forge of the Artificer to Be Priced at $29.99 with Like.
Except the work load lore for this edition has been done in E: RftLW, where as the SCAG had to be both in a far too small package.
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2024) Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently?.L I don't think it's the same target being discussed. 5.0 was so incredibly far from ithe 2-3/24hr target that any movement towards...
-
tetrasodium reacted to CreamCloud0's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently? with
Love.
i would be interested in seeing how each class's design in 5e would need to change if they were rebalanced on the basis that 'an... -
tetrasodium reacted to Scribe's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
It won't take long before anything 5, is reprinted and 'fixed' to 5.5, for a small fee of course. The compatibility argument was just...
-
tetrasodium reacted to evilbob's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently? with Like.
Hey again @EzekielRaiden! You might hate me for this but we just finished up a 1-16 campaign (just over a year) where the average...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Zardnaar's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
That's your subjective opinion. Objectively power creep in effect has obsolete most of the old clases and archetypes. It's not...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".You seem to be arguing against too many people and mixing up points made by different people then blaming them for distracting you when...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".I said nothing of the sort and very much felt that 5.5 should have been more significant in its willingness to change. Absolutely no...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Cap'n Kobold's post in the thread D&D 5E (2024) Can A Spell Caster Out Damage a Martial Consistently? with Like.
The thing about fireball, and spells in general, is that unlike martials, which generally have to be built to do a specific thing well...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".There were so many arguments going on with folks who thought that the edition was totally incompatible if there was going to be any...
-
tetrasodium replied to the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""".No there were literally people supporting the level of strictness that @Desdichado described with backwards compatibility and the most...
-
tetrasodium reacted to Desdichado's post in the thread D&D 5E (2014) I feel like the surveys gaslit WotC about """"Backwards Compatibility"""" with Like.
Second hand information? Yeah, it's the information in the OP. I'm reacting to it. I also made that caveat. Twice. Funny that you...