TiQuinn's latest activity

I’m just going to go back to my original point that you quoted: as much as I like new settings, and would be fine if they made one, I’m...

The most recent edition change was last year, which is why I say it wasn’t much different.

I wouldn’t necessarily call excluding something written for another setting an “arbitrary” line. But then again, I’ve played at tables...

It still comes down to a social interaction issue. As well as recognition that it’s ultimately a game.

So you see the issue as the DM could conceivably approve or deny the use of game components? That can happen with virtually anything. I...

Why shouldn’t that be necessary? Setting specific classes, spells, and options are a good thing because they match the lore of those...

Agreed. He's drawing his power from another source, not his lineage, which is definitely Warlock.

Will seemed more like a Warlock in that moment than a Sorcerer, to be honest.

Then maybe I misunderstood your point, I guess. It doesn’t really matter that 3e and 4e are different from 5e at this point. It’s in the...

It’s also a retroactive perspective. There’s nothing to be done about the change from 3e to 4e to 5e. It’s relitigating the past. Also...

There are at least two categories of situation where honest people of good will can’t just plan ahead avoid them. 1. Someone is...

I really like the flavor and details of it - I would totally use that for a Ravenloft campaign!

Oh, I see. Yeah, that would be the first thing I’d try. I actually already edited the opening post to drop the DCs by 5, because that...

And I’m out of that thread. Another voice decides to join late to relitigate a bunch of nonsense spewed in other threads.

That’s all I’m saying - if it’s a problem, maybe drop the DC.