Recent content by Torin Ironfist

It seems to me that either way, the vampire is in trouble. If the Disintegrate spell were to function before the vampires ability to transform than i don't see the dust pile turning into a gaseous cloud and floating away, and if the vamp changes first then the Disintegrate was applied the...

Other than the summon creature bit, anyone can be willing or unwilling to receive any spell. Most groups assume its communicated in some form, or just don't think about in game as the player sits at the table and says to the DM "ok i'm casting cat's grace on player X." For those that want to...

A fireball spell written on a scroll with something akin to a metamagic FEAT added in the writing is not a fireball spell with the metamagic feat, but a new spell that is an enhanced fireball. You cannot ~write~ a feat down on a scroll. If you look at the PHB on pg 88 about metamagic feats you...

Teleportation doesn't allow for someone or something to come out on an unsupported surface... ridiculous as that is i do see the point in not being able to teleport your enemy 100 miles into the sky to kill them.... but that does not apply to this spell either way, it allows 2 people to switch...

fifth, we are talking about the subject of the thread, not your hijack post :P (no offense intended). Fathertome I do not see anywhere in the PHB where it explicitly states that a touch spell can be delivered via an unarmed strike and that the spell otherwise functions as normal... i would...

My interpretation doesnt say anything of the sort, my interpretation in this also doesnt matter at all. If you care to ask my opinion, i would again, actually agree with you... if i miss his ac with his armor on, or off, it doesnt matter, i missed him... but that wasnt what i was asking about...

Maybe its because i do not have the past years of experience in D&D as some do, but I dont see why this argument is not what you like to speak of in a rules forum... it seems to me this would be the exact type of argument you would want to talk about in a rules forum. I am not looking to annoy...

I agree with your statement, however, just like the example imo it is flawed, the basic idea is flawed as well. We are dealing with an extrodinary spell ability that doesn't function at the same time the rest of the spell functions... the spell is "active" so to speak before its effects can be...

I do believe i am the Duskblade in question. The way i viewed it was such: If my sword functions in all ways as my hand would when channeling a spell into it, then the spells effects do not change/are not negated. As i understood it at the time, and, this seemed to be a big part of the...