Ceramic DM Winter 07 (Final Judgment Posted)

orchid blossom said:
I took two semesters of creative writing in college and sometimes reading other people's stories was absolute torture.

Of course, there were a few fantastic writers that made it all worthwhile too.

We get consistently better quality here in Ceramic DM than I ever saw in those classes.
Tell me about it. For tomorrow, I'll have to prepare a short analysis/critique of a text that is horrible. Reading it once was tough; I just cursed my way through a second time (for the analysis), and I think other students looked at me strangely because I couldn't sit still while reading that dreck. Terrible style, no proof-reading whatsoever, and boringest plot with a totally unlikeable protagonist. Argh!

The seminar is done by an accomplished author who's visiting the university ("poet in residence"), and we had a lottery on which texts to discuss. Mine isn't among the chosen - so to get me involved, I had to do the introductory analysis. And the author adamantly refused to give even short, informal commentary on my and other stories that weren't drawn for discussion. Curiously, we read 5 stories so far, and all of the authors had never written anything before and more or less just did to get into the seminar with the author (there was an additional seminar on his books, which they attended). Of those who seem to be really interested in writing, there's one story among the lucky 9 that are discussed. So it's really disappointing, especially with the direct comparison of Ceramic DM.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


KidCthulhu said:
I don't even want to know where you plan on inserting a well oiled semicolon.

Between independent clauses linked with a transitional phrase. That "supercomma" stuff is just perverted.
 




Round 1 Match 7

Round 1 Match7 (Wednesday):
Carpe David vs Maxfieldjadenfox

Sialia's not writing, so I won't set an official word limit. The guideline is don't bore the judges and make us want to stop reading. Here are your pics. You have 72 hours from post time.
 

Attachments

  • 1_7_1.jpg
    1_7_1.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 139
  • 1_7_2.jpg
    1_7_2.jpg
    47.8 KB · Views: 140
  • 1_7_3.jpg
    1_7_3.jpg
    40.8 KB · Views: 142
  • 1_7_4.jpg
    1_7_4.jpg
    15.5 KB · Views: 137

OK, match 7 is posted. I have some judgements done for a couple of the rounds on Friday. I'll be putting them up later today as I get time away from work.
 

yangnome said:
Round 1 Match7 (Wednesday):
Carpe David vs Maxfieldjadenfox

Sialia's not writing, so I won't set an official word limit. The guideline is don't bore the judges and make us want to stop reading. Here are your pics. You have 72 hours from post time.

Um yeah. And what sort of drugs should I be doing to make a connection between these pictures, sadist?
 

Berandor said:
Tell me about it. For tomorrow, I'll have to prepare a short analysis/critique of a text that is horrible. Reading it once was tough; I just cursed my way through a second time (for the analysis), and I think other students looked at me strangely because I couldn't sit still while reading that dreck. Terrible style, no proof-reading whatsoever, and boringest plot with a totally unlikeable protagonist. Argh!

The seminar is done by an accomplished author who's visiting the university ("poet in residence"), and we had a lottery on which texts to discuss. Mine isn't among the chosen - so to get me involved, I had to do the introductory analysis. And the author adamantly refused to give even short, informal commentary on my and other stories that weren't drawn for discussion. Curiously, we read 5 stories so far, and all of the authors had never written anything before and more or less just did to get into the seminar with the author (there was an additional seminar on his books, which they attended). Of those who seem to be really interested in writing, there's one story among the lucky 9 that are discussed. So it's really disappointing, especially with the direct comparison of Ceramic DM.


Well, Berandor, you and I appear to be trapped in the same hell-dimension. I'm taking Stylistic Analysis and the book is just turgid. Tomorrow I have to turn in a paragraph written in noun style, then change it to verb style, then write an analysis of the two paragraphs, paying particular attention to hypotaxis, parataxis, and isocolon, and their effects on the style... Fun!
 

Remove ads

Top