fireinthedust
Explorer
I owe gnomes an apology! I was working under a false presumption based upon Google searches. I have finally received my PHB today, and discovered that many of the peices were not in fact in the book!
Bearded gnomes: p291 (deafened condition illustration), and p292 (unconscious). The rest are, as you say, acceptably Fey and spritely.
The illustrations I was looking at were the Conceptopolis ones; ditto the halflings, though those are in the PHB. The only gnome 5e pictures I could find on google, that weren't from 4e, were old man gnomes. One in particular, in the 5e Races search I did, kept coming up over and over.
THAT SAID, and I mean this, I still like the halflings. I noticed something with my kids, who are very young, is that their heads and feet are in similar proportion to the big-head-small-feet halflings in the book. The proportions are closer to very young children, and in fact are closer to this than the Gnomes are in their sections of the book.
I do miss the unity William OConnor brought to 4e, image-wise. Oh well.
Bearded gnomes: p291 (deafened condition illustration), and p292 (unconscious). The rest are, as you say, acceptably Fey and spritely.
The illustrations I was looking at were the Conceptopolis ones; ditto the halflings, though those are in the PHB. The only gnome 5e pictures I could find on google, that weren't from 4e, were old man gnomes. One in particular, in the 5e Races search I did, kept coming up over and over.
THAT SAID, and I mean this, I still like the halflings. I noticed something with my kids, who are very young, is that their heads and feet are in similar proportion to the big-head-small-feet halflings in the book. The proportions are closer to very young children, and in fact are closer to this than the Gnomes are in their sections of the book.
I do miss the unity William OConnor brought to 4e, image-wise. Oh well.