D&D 5E The Warlord shouldn't be a class... change my mind!

Garthanos said:

A baseline thing I think of is allowing a fighter to trade an attack to scan for an opening which allows him to make the next attack as though he had a superiority die for it.

Click to expand...

Garthanos said:

The place some pine for or paradise they want to create on earth is called Arcadia. They might consider or treat wizards and artificiers with the respect you find others reserve for priests. The game world has a group or loose philosophic association? not sure what to think of it as, called restorationists who want all of humanity to have the heritage of knowledge and magic that once drenched the world. Arcadians are kind of a step up from that.

Click to expand...

Garthanos said:

This little tidbit right there effectively gives a level 5 fighter an at-will maneuver. He is putting all his eggs in one basket to get it.

Click to expand...

Manchurian said:

Here is another sick combo. .. Arkadian Knight/BladeMaster

Click to expand...

cmad1977 said:

5e already has a ‘warlord’. It’s a subclass. Battle master.

Click to expand...

Undrave said:

the Battlemaster is to the Warlord what the Eldritch Knight is to Wizard. It's a multiclass subclass, only it's with a class that doesn't exist.

Click to expand...

Manchurian said:

Yeah....but those bonuses for that 2ed 3.5 is nice.... an stacks ....Talk about alone ginsu...Battle master ain't a sit down subclass....it's pretty active knowing what you got to do to get that blade technique....Samurai/ BladeMaster...Stackable benefit theory....If You Dm'ed me you would need to calculate so cause we so good we would definitely be adding numbers alot..But all an all I want to be member of your team if conversation does team Tournament....Please count Me In On Your side.... Lol

Click to expand...

Azzy said:

Really?

Click to expand...