FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
Why oh why are 90% of our disagreements here regarding what basic words mean.
D&D General DM Authority
Oofta
Legend
Maybe we need a DM to make the call?
FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
We do have one! And when someone gets too angry and hostile they even kick them from our thread/site.Maybe we need a DM to make the call?
Thomas Shey
Legend
Because a big part of most disagreements are communication breakdowns, and word choice is a major element in that?
Thomas Shey
Legend
Of course it is. Which is why I've never argued its for everyone. Almost all my arguments have been against the idea that it can't work at all, or is intrinsically an inferior approach.
Thomas Shey
Legend
Its not clear why, in that situation, the GM should have a veto option other than tradition.
FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
Because it's understood that RAW or what the guy with the most experience would rule for his campaign isn't always the best answer for this campaign.
Maxperson
Morkus from Orkus
Because someone needs the veto power and if the players have it, the game breaks down. You can't run a game when the players are vetoing this and that. It's too disruptive.
Thomas Shey
Legend
Funny, I've done that on and off for years and yet somehow I seem to keep games going. Unless you were assuming single-person vetoes.
Thomas Shey
Legend
Seems like that's a reason for the GM to explain that to the players; if the players still disagree, that seems like they're not seeing it that way. And I'm back to suggesting that if the GM can't deal with that, there's a serious disconnect between him and his players somewhere (since he couldn't convince them it'd serve the game better).
Similar Threads
