Nerf the Fighter!

Virgil Sagecaster · May 29, 2003

Do you think the fighter got nerfed due to all of the improvements that the ranger and barbarian classes receivied in 3.5?

Olgar Shiverstone · May 29, 2003

It's not that the fighter got nerfed; it's more like the ranger and barbarian got de-nerfed (anti-nerfed? innerfed?).

alsih2o · May 29, 2003

Olgar Shiverstone said:
It's not that the fighter got nerfed; it's more like the ranger and barbarian got de-nerfed (anti-nerfed? innerfed?).

antinerfificationed i believe

ForceUser · May 29, 2003

Let's please not make D&D subject to MUDflation. To wit, fixing class A does not nerf class B. Class B has not changed, therefore, it has not been nerfed.

Fighters kick butt. What more do you want? Sharks with laser beams attached to their heads?

Olgar Shiverstone · May 29, 2003

I would, but they nerfed the frickin' lasers!

*Must go clear head now; too much nerf-helium"

psionotic · May 29, 2003

If they do anything to the fighter, it should be a wider selection of good mid and high level bonus fighter feats. As it stands now, there is little reason to advance above about 8th or 10th level. (and in fact, no one in any of the 3e campaigns I have played in or ran has taken more than 6 fighter levels)

Olgar Shiverstone · May 30, 2003

All nerfing aside, I was rather impressed with the feats in Incursion in Dungeon 100 -- most would make great mid- to high-level fighter feats.

Though I can't figure out the difference between Greater Combat Reflexes and Improved Combat Reflexes.

Bran Blackbyrd · May 30, 2003

This message has been brought to you by Nerf.

All we can do is wait and see...

I'm pretty sure all I ever had was the nerf boomerang. It spent a lot of time on the roof and in the tree.

The picture is the whole family, together again, for the last time.

Viktyr Gehrig · May 30, 2003

psionotic said:
If they do anything to the fighter, it should be a wider selection of good mid and high level bonus fighter feats. As it stands now, there is little reason to advance above about 8th or 10th level. (and in fact, no one in any of the 3e campaigns I have played in or ran has taken more than 6 fighter levels)

Only a very few rare characters should go much higher than 10th level in a core class, anyway. That's what PrCs are for.

hong · May 30, 2003

Korimyr the Rat said:
Only a very few rare characters should go much higher than 10th level in a core class, anyway. That's what PrCs are for.

You're thinking of d20 Modern. In D&D, there's absolutely nothing wrong with having 20th level single-classed characters.

Nerf the Fighter!

Virgil Sagecaster

First Post

Olgar Shiverstone

Legend

alsih2o

First Post

ForceUser

Explorer

Olgar Shiverstone

Legend

psionotic

Registered User

Olgar Shiverstone

Legend

Bran Blackbyrd

Explorer

Attachments

Viktyr Gehrig

First Post

hong

WotC's bitch

Similar Threads