Daggerheart Sold Out in Two Weeks, Has Three-Year Plan in Place

The game's stock was supposed to last a year.
1767198137436.png


A recent interview with Business Insider revealed just how well Daggerheart did for Critical Role's Darrington Press when it first launched earlier this year. Ed Lopez, Critical Role's chief operating officer, revealed that Daggerheart sold out in two weeks. According to Lopez, Critical Role anticipated that their stock would last a year, but the game was forced to go into reprints in a hurry. "The amount of units that we ordered we thought was going to last us a year, and it lasted us literally two weeks," Lopez said. "It's a great problem, it's a Champagne problem, but it's now changing our view in terms of what this product can be."

Lopez also revealed that Darrington Press has a three-year plan in place for Daggerheart, which includes the already announced Hope & Fear expansion, which adds a new domain and several new classes and backgrounds to the game.

Lopez also spoke about the hires of Jeremy Crawford and Chris Perkins, stating that the two would be working on both Daggerheart and D&D material for Darrington Press. "We really want their creative juices brought to the world of 'Daggerheart.' That being said, we're also doing a bunch of 'D&D' stuff, and who better to bring in than the guys who used to do it?" Lopez said.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad

Insulting other members
1. Thats not what happened...
2. Thanks for stepping up as the example.
What actually happened was I pointed out that DH was a better Grimdark game than DH and provided a reason why. You apparently found a comparison to 5e here too much to bear and threw not particularly good rules against the wall in a desperate attempt to prove otherwise. I pointed out these were nonsense. You continued to make the claim. I actually put together a post with details. You ran away with your tail between your legs.
 



What actually happened was I pointed out that DH was a better Grimdark game than DH and provided a reason why. You apparently found a comparison to 5e here too much to bear and threw not particularly good rules against the wall in a desperate attempt to prove otherwise. I pointed out these were nonsense. You continued to make the claim. I actually put together a post with details. You ran away with your tail between your legs.
The argument about Grimdarkness was built around the idea of whether Scars were Grimdark enough to be "better" at it than 5E. But all of that was personal opinion. I don't think it is fair to classify that side discussion as some sort of flame war.
 

Pokémon type system??

Edit: so why not just have damage instead of differentiating physical and magical... or a better question... how many types signify we've entered Pokémon territory vs. Non Pokémon territory?
I though you wanted more damage types, like in Pokemon? They're about 15 types, that are strong or weak vs different types.
 

Attachments

  • poketype.png
    poketype.png
    25.4 KB · Views: 8


What actually happened was...

Mod Note:
..that you made it personal and got yourself threadbanned for your trouble.


You ran away with your tail between your legs.

Disengaging from a discussion going bad is not cowardice. It is a sign of good sense.

Trying to shame and insult people for how they choose to (not) engage with you... doesn't make you look like a good person to talk to. Treat people better.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top