Cosmere picked up by Apple TV

No, I'm not, because it's not saying it's "definitely a bad business decision".

That is literally you projecting on to my comment lol.
Yes, totally me projecting after interpreting your own conclusion
I think the answer is very definitely no, personally
to the question you asked yourself:
Is blowing hundreds of millions (and likely high hundreds of millions at that) on adapting Stormlight - which is kind of a nothing story with nothing meaningful or terribly human to say, at least in the 3000+ pages of books 1-3, a good use of money for Apple?
Stuff likes this robs me completey of any desire to read the rest of your points and participate in a discussion with you, so I don't.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

What Apple seem to be hoping is that because Sanderson is a meticulous writer and planner (which they Duffer brothers are not), him acting as showrunner in a visual medium rather than a written one, won't be a problem. And it might not, if he can learn to delegate, if he can learn to edit, if he's willing to plan in the right.
Which I think is the thing. By all impressions, Sanderson is a serious, hard working professional who works well with others and doesn’t have an overinflated ego. Which already puts him ahead of a lot of people working in TV. If he doesn’t have a particular skill he can be trusted to study to acquire it or give way to someone better qualified in that area.

It’s obviously a risk, but less of a risk than it might be trusting someone of a different character.
 

Yes, totally me projecting after interpreting your own conclusion

to the question you asked yourself:

Stuff likes this robs me completey of any desire to read the rest of your points and participate in a discussion with you, so I don't.
I mean, you should read what you quoted. I literally asked if it was a good deal! That wasn't a purely rhetorical question, that was an actual question! I gave my answer and expected others which didn't make up other opinions and assign them to me. My opinion is right there and doesn't need to be re-written incorrectly. Good grief! I didn't, for example, say anything like it was a "nonsense decision" - that's all you. But you attributed that to me anyway, instead of using what I did say.
 

I'm a little worried about this.

Not because I don't think Sanderson is sane, relatively sensible, or organised or whatever, but for two specific reasons:

1) Sanderson has almost no experience in the industry and this is a huge role.
This is a legitimate worry!

But Sanderson already employs a massive team of people to help with his work. I don't think he'll have any trouble adding people who are VERY familiar with the process and fully accepting their input.

2) He's taking on a ton of work when he's already doing a ton of work.

This part, I don't think I'm worried about. The man's work ethic and output is phenomenal.

Years ago, he wrote a novel (Warbreaker) and posted EVERY step of his writing process along the way. From notes, to initial draft to edits and revisions. The speed, output and dedication was truly amazing. I can't think of anyone who could match it (Well maybe King in his early, cocaine fueled, days).

In other words, rather than being skeptical, as I usually would be on something like this - I'm quite optimistic.
 

In other words, rather than being skeptical, as I usually would be on something like this - I'm quite optimistic.
I'm optimistic on Mistborn. Everything about that seems very doable.

That will live and die on the casting though, given the tight focus. If they get someone in charge of casting like Nina Gold*, they're well, uh, golden. If on, the other hand, they get the sort of people who have cast a lot of Netflix projects, it'll be a car crash. Apple TV has usually done pretty well on casting (it's complicated because it seems like the don't micromanage casting the way Netflix and Prime apparently do, but rather let the production companies handle it for the most part), so I'm hopeful here. The major worry re: casting is the level of power that Sanderson has. Not that he's irresponsible or w/e, but sometimes people with the final say on casting (which I imagine he has given the Variety article) have, whilst trying to be helpful, lead to some pretty awful casting decisions (this does include some experienced directors - but almost exclusively ones who have a long history of mediocre-to-bad work). We'll see though.

I'm not optimistic on Stormlight, because however helpful he is, it's an extremely hard project to adapt (in part because of choices he himself made in writing it - it's very much a book series which relies on that format, not just "a story" like some novels are), and whether in live-action or animation, would be ludicrously expensive to adapt, and be decade or more of commitment. Even if everything that can go right, goes right, it might never go beyond "Well that's a workmanlike adaptation of a series that's too esoteric, extended and nerdy to really hold the audience that level of financial and time investment would demand". However, I do think Apple TV might realize this, so maybe it's not worth worrying about. It might be something to consider much later on, when Stormlight is either finished or significantly closer to finished. I mean, on a positive note, I will say, Apple TV, unlike Netflix, wouldn't commission it with the full intention of cancelling it after 2-3 seasons.

* = She cast Rome, Game of Thrones, Wolf Hall, The Crown, Top of the Lake, Chernobyl, Bad Sisters, Andor, Slow Horses, Baby Reindeer, some of those just being like, the best-cast shows on TV even I don't like them, like The Crown or Wolf Hall, and some of them being very difficult casting assignments like Chernobyl. Other ones there's some just some really brilliant casting like GoT, Andor, Slow Horses. I notice Slow Horses and Bad Sisters are Apple TV shows.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top