D&D 5E (2024) D&D 2024 Is Now OFFICIALLY Called "5.5e"

The 2024 rules get a new official designation.
5.5_enworld.png


Settling a debate that has lasted for over two years, the current edition of Dungeons & Dragons, which has been known by various names up until now, has finally received an official designation: D&D 5.5e.

Previously, the current ruleset was referred to as 'One D&D', before becoming 'D&D 2024'. Other variations exist, but the most common version used by fans was D&D 5.5.

The 5.5 terminology echoes the edition names used in the early 2000s for D&D 3E and D&D 3.5.

D&D Beyond has an FAQ related to the name change. In it, they say that "Earlier on, [the 2024 rules] were referred to differently. As D&D Beyond evolved and more players used both versions side by side, it became clear that “5.5e” matched how the community already talks about the game and made things easier to understand."

The terminology will be used going forward on D&D Beyond, although unlike the 3E/3.5 hardcovers, the physical book titles will not include any edition designations.

The 2014 edition of D&D is to continue to be called "5e", with the 2024 version being "5.5e". WotC says that "5.5e refers to content that uses the 2024 updated core rules, which are fully compatible with Fifth Edition."

Despite including the "e" (for "edition") WotC continues to maintain that 5.5e is not a new edition, and merely a 'rules update', or 'version'. Whether 'edition' and 'version' are synonyms or not we'll leave people to debate.

The logo at the top of the page is our own mockup to represent the news, and is not an offical rebranding.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I don't think you can redo every class and spell in a game, each keeping the same name but describing different mechanical entities, and say it's more than trivially compatible, but ymmv.
But if you gave them different names, would you say the new classes and new spells are compatible with the existing game? If not, are new classes and new spells ever compatible with the existing game?

But if so, it's just a labelling issue, not a compatibity issue.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

It would be more convenient if the two spells were named differently, sure. But that’s just a convenience issue. They’re both perfectly cromulant, compatible 5.x spells and both work within the rules. Call them Fireball 1 and Fireball B (or something catchier) and the problem goes away.
Heck, I blatantly include spells from earlier editions in my games, in ancient places forgotten by time. My players have found scrolls and even dessicated liches that throw around 2e spells!

This is even cromulent to settings like FR, where prior editions are just earlier periods of time, and there's no reason to think those older spells have stopped existing (even if extremely rare).
 






Being compatible doesn't mean being the same game. 5.5 is a much worse version in many aspects than the already not-so-good 5e.

Worse for you perhaps. I like most of the changes but for some people an older version or a different game will suit their needs better.

I really don't know what you're complaining about - several of the splat books made pretty significant changes from the original PHB. Did they make it a different game? They kept the basics the same they just made some much-needed adjustments. Monks needed buffing, paladin smites could be abused and needed a bit of a nerf, people complained fighter types didn't have enough impact so they gave them more (and people, of course, complain about that as well), etc.. The handful of changes I don't care for I can ignore.

They can't please everyone.
 

Roll20 has been using 2024, including the "2024" Monster Manual. I also just noticed that they mostly drop the 5e. The new FR books are for "Dungeons and Dragons 2024". But there still some "5e"s and "5th"s around.

I wonder if they will switch? It would help them clean things up.
 
Last edited:


Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top