D&D General D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?

A WizKids miniature reveals the iconic character's face for the first time.
Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.27.52.png


The Dungeons & Dragons Red Box, famously illustrated by Larry Elmore in 1983, featured cover art of a warrior fighting a red dragon. The piece is an iconic part of D&D's history.

WizKids is creating a 50th Anniversary D&D miniatures set for the D&D Icons of the Realms line which includes models based on classic art from the game, such as the AD&D Player's Handbook's famous 'A Paladin In Hell' piece by David Sutherland in 1978, along with various monsters and other iconic images. The set will be available in July 2024.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.31.00.png

paladininhell.jpg

Amongst the collection is Elmore's dragon-fighting warrior. This character has only ever been seen from behind, and has never been named or identified. However, WizKids’ miniature gives us our first look at them from the front. The warrior is a woman; the view from behind is identical to the original art, while the view from the front--the first time the character's face has ever been seen--is, as WizKids told ComicBook.com, "purposefully and clearly" a woman. This will be one of 10 secret rare miniatures included in the D&D Icons of the Realms: 50th Anniversary booster boxes.


redboxwarriormini.png




s-l1600.jpg

The original artist, Larry Elmore, says otherwise. (Update—the linked post has since been edited).

It's a man!

Gary didn't know what he wanted, all he wanted was something simple that would jump out at you. He wanted a male warrior. If it was a woman, you would know it for I'm pretty famous for painting women.

There was never a question in all these years about the male warrior.

No one thought it was a female warrior. "Whoever thought it was a female warrior is quite crazy and do not know what they are talking about."

This is stupid. I painted it, I should know.
- Larry Elmore​

Whether or not Elmore's intent was for the character to be a man, it seems that officially she's a woman. Either way, it's an awesome miniature. And for those who love the art, you can buy a print from Larry Elmore's official website.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

View attachment 361826

The Dungeons & Dragons Red Box, famously illustrated by Larry Elmore in 1983, featured cover art of a warrior fighting a red dragon. The piece is an iconic part of D&D's history.

WizKids is creating a 50th Anniversary D&D miniatures set for the D&D Icons of the Realms line which includes models based on classic art from the game, such as the AD&D Player's Handbook's famous 'A Paladin In Hell' piece by David Sutherland in 1978, along with various monsters and other iconic images. The set will be available in July 2024.


Amongst the collection is Elmore's dragon-fighting warrior. This character has only ever been seen from behind, and has never been named or identified. However, WizKids’ miniature gives us our first look at them from the front. The warrior is a woman; the view from behind is identical to the original art, while the view from the front--the first time the character's face has ever been seen--is, as WizKids told ComicBook.com, "purposefully and clearly" a woman. This will be one of 10 secret rare miniatures included in the D&D Icons of the Realms: 50th Anniversary booster boxes.



The original artist, Larry Elmore, says otherwise. (Update—the linked post has since been edited).

It's a man!

Gary didn't know what he wanted, all he wanted was something simple that would jump out at you. He wanted a male warrior. If it was a woman, you would know it for I'm pretty famous for painting women.

There was never a question in all these years about the male warrior.

No one thought it was a female warrior. "Whoever thought it was a female warrior is quite crazy and do not know what they are talking about."

This is stupid. I painted it, I should know.
- Larry Elmore​

Whether or not Elmore's intent was for the character to be a man, it seems that officially she's a woman. Either way, it's an awesome miniature. And for those who love the art, you can buy a print from Larry Elmore's official website.
I support larry i did say that, it's a guy. As far as trying to shame me "cause it's 2 years later" well it just popped up in a Google search so there you go. And I don't care what anyone else says, larry said it was a guy in 1983 we all thought it was a guy so there it is😁
Almost 2 years later but let’s be sure and say Larry said he painted it as a man but said people can interpret it however they want…you’ll get to those posts in this thread as you keep reading :)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

With the red box cover, all we have for the text are the back and legs of a warrior. There is nothing about gender, and a reasonable person can analyze that art and interpret it as any gender. The only reason that so many folks are convinced that it has to be a man is because it fits their personal assumptions about what the backs and legs of men look like (even though most male-identifying people look nothing like the image on the box cover).

Maybe for those who only saw the box.

The Fighter though, or a similiar figure, is used inside the box in the solo adventure itself and you see their face. It appears to be a distinctly masculine character, but I suppose there are different ideas of what masculine is or is not...so...
 



Maybe for those who only saw the box.

The Fighter though, or a similiar figure, is used inside the box in the solo adventure itself and you see their face. It appears to be a distinctly masculine character, but I suppose there are different ideas of what masculine is or is not...so...
The person on the cover and the person in the solo adventure are different people. Completely different armor, gear, and helmet. Remember, the original cover art was supposed to have three people. Totally different characters than what’s inside.
 


Ultimately, it's art. There's no wrong answer here. Your interpretation is valid.
Well, yeah . . . unless your interpretation is to get angry at folks with different interpretations . . .

Elmore intended for the warrior in the original painting to be a dude. Folks have interpreted it different ways over the decades. WizKids is (re)interpreting the warrior as a lady. It's all good. Unless it makes you angry, then you need to chillax!
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top