D&D General Greyhawk book is NOT 'Shield Lands' but 'Borderlands of Iuz' according to team member

According to Jay Scott, the book is actually called 'Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Borderlands of Iuz'.
Iuz.webp

Iuz, courtesy of greyhawk.fandom.com

Last week, Luke Gygax referred to the upcoming Greyhawk book for Dungeons & Dragons as Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Shield Lands. However, it turns out that that might not be the actual title.

According to Jay Scott, who is on the writing team, the book is actually called 'Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Borderlands of Iuz'.

I came on to clarify as I believe Luke was mistaken when he was excitedly talking about the project and the Easley artwork of Melf. My real name is Jay Scott: I was directly mentioned in the press conference with Luke and Dan Ayoub .... We have a project meeting with Luke and the entire team this evening, and the project is on point to make all date goals. I will specifically ask Luke about his comments on the title. To my knowledge, Book 1 is still titled: Melf's Guide to Greyhawk: The Borderlands of Iuz. If a change has been made, I would be happy to let you know here.

Possibly more importantly, Scott also refers to the book as 'Book 1'--hinting that a series of books is on the table. Additionally, he refers to "the old, gritty Greyhawk while being written in current 5.5 2024 ruleset". Finally, he notes that no WotC personnel are involved with the project, although the book is 'Official Greyhawk D&D WotC.

Scott also mentioned that the team was small, including Stephen Radney-Macfarland and Les "Oblivion Seeker" Reno.

The title Borderlands of Iuz refers to an evil demigod in the Greyhawk setting. He lives on Oerth itself (the world of Greyhawk) ruling an empire, and is the son of Graz'zt, one of the demon lords of the Abyss, and Iggwilv, a human witch. The Shield Lands, by contrast, refer to a number of provinces, many of which are ruled by Iuz, with the exception of the 'New Shield Lands', which seeks to reclaim the areas lost to Iuz.

 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

That's great (and pretty much where my brain keeps going), but it's also part of my confusion.

That's an i, right, not an L.

So probably something close to "Youse"

That is close to how I imagine it.
Similar to how Joe Pesci says the word 'youths' ("you-ts) in My Cousin Vinny:
 


And then there's Stoink.
I kind of love "Stoink," because it's a believably realistic dumb name. A pity we never got the City-State of Stoink gazetteer. I picture it as a random slice of the real Midwest dropped right into Oerth (much of which is also very Midwest).

If you visit Stoink, make sure to have some cheese curds, frozen custard and all the bratwurst you can eat before your heart explodes.
 
Last edited:

If no WotC folks are involved at all . . . this is likely to appear on the DM's Guild.

More likely, no one from WotC gets writing or design credits. But if WotC is publishing the book, their folks are involved.
...yeah, there's no way this gets published as an official D+D book in traditional retail channels without a wizards of the coast editorial pass, including art, layout, + trade dress...
 





At this point I am glad there will be more Greyhawk material coming out from familiar names, no matter the subtitle, or publishing method. As we get closer to release, these things will be clarified. The 'grittiness' of Greyhawk seems an inappropriate term. Greyhawk is Greyhawk, it is pulp Sword and Sorcery meets Ivanhoe. It is Lahnkmar and Moorcock. There are dungeons, dark and dangerous, Flaeness wide intrigue, and consequences for players actions. I think of Greyhawk as more granular than gritty. It is world building with starter prompts. I await more...
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top