Search results

That particular ability is only good for recovering 1st-5th level spells. It's nice but that is exactly where you have multiple slots already. It's a problem when you can only have 1 6th-8th level spell slot because you can't really even use it to power up a lower level spell. Why would you? I...

Just have to say....Yay WotC!!!

21-30 hours (5-6 sessions) more than that and it gets old.

I like the Bard it seems pretty understated to me unlike 3/4e.

Good. Dragonlance is among my favorite settings. We never did use any of the modules just the setting and it was fun. I am intrigued as how it will fit into 5e.

Well that was unhelpful.

Most of them are going to be things already done in other versions of the game and done in books like Unearthed Arcana. Sidebars are not a big deal 2E was chock full of them.

I voted for wrong representation, I am not concerned with equal balance in a vacuum or in a spotlight sense. I more prefer balance achieved through strength in different focuses. I like when different classes can be stronger or weaker all across the spectrum and in the end everybody is equal in...

I'd like to see two scores be primary for martial classes excluding the Paladin and Ranger which should have three scores to balance on like primary magic user classes. That automatically starts erasing the QW/LF issue at the beginning. Basically take a page out of Fantasy Craft's book and do...

I definitely want to see some kind of treatment done on it. But I don't want it as something that replaces a character's core power set but an add on or a natural horizontal extension of their existing power set. I want to see it in core so that it's seen front and center so it's not sidelined...

I agree the fighter in DnD is trying to cover too much ground and gives a choice of being good at nothing, like 3/3.5e or limiting everything like 4e. I would love to see a concept like Fantasy Craft, splitting the fighter into several classes each with their own focus. Coupled with a...

Do fixes rarely and maybe put out something bundled up in Dragon every once in while. I hated the "trickle" model and it was not a small factor in making me give up 4e entirely.

I don't care given no matter what they do it's just an abstraction anyway. Just give a me hit points for both the monsters and characters more near the 1e/2e baseline and either -10 or -constitution no adjustment for dying and I am fine. Whatever is done just keep it simple please.

It's been said a couple times in this thread but I'm going to buy it and at least try it a few times because it will be a supported DnD and like it or not there's a unique feel to playing a game called Dnd that I miss and want back. From what is coming out about the game it seems to be...

Storyteller, heavily so it seems.

I voted "other", I think that it should not be accounted for in the base rules at all but have sidebars saying "For RPGA play we suggest this....."

Yes, the more I have thought about it I think alot of the disconnect I have with 4e is literally the presentation. It makes not a lick of sense but there it is. I had thought it was fake give it did sound just like 4e to me and there would be NO way they would have written and internally...

This would never happen but I think they should do something like some other games keep the specialist with excluded schools and/or double cost schools like Pathfinder. Then put the Generalist on slower advance track both with experience and spell aqusistion.

I play Fantasy Craft so I use both.

As I said at TBP I'm glad I have no dog in this hunt, but if pushed I think they should kill the Warlord take his stuff and give it to the Fighter. Also give him some skills outside direct physical stuff with more than 2 skill points a level for christsake! I voted "Other" the choices...