Search results

On the flipside, would you contend that the rogue with a dagger in his offhand doesn't get a +1 at all? Rangers don't have special rules saying they can wield weapons in both hands, just that they can ignore the offhand requirement, are you saying rangers can't use the two weapon fighting...

You are wielding a light blade if you are wielding it in your offhand unless you have some definition of wield I'm not aware of.

Yep, another good reason to never read too deeply into custserv rules. They are there to help keep your game going, not to pick between specifics.

A ruling critical hits that doesn't deal with vorpal at all probably shouldn't be used to argue vorpal rules, yes.

TWICE AS GOOD, if only because Falchions need the boost and 2d6 twohanded is a maul that can't be vorpal.

It's fine assuming that you as a DM keep the power balance between the PCs and the monsters they encounter equal. Simply reducing the amount of gold they find in treasure hordes and giving them more redundant magic weapons would work. It also depends on who they are selling to. If you...

I don't quite understand here, you can attack with either weapon in a turn. Even a basic melee attack is a power, so it's quite clear you can use powers with either hand. If you're two-weapon fighting, you can use your powers with either of your two weapons.

Someone else along with me has already responded to the custserv quote which can't be used for close rules references since it doesn't pertain to the situation at hand. The damage roll thing has already been countered by me multiple times, not once of which you have countered.

Tell that to my college bookstore.

As I already stated Smurph, this devolves into a nonexistent timing rule debate. The case with crits is different from non crits solely because there is a break where you calculate crit damage and when you add vorpal die. You can argue it your way by RAW, it's true.

That's a pretty reasonable houserule, though I would like to see the economic model of a world where any resource is infinite so long as you can make armor out of it.

Andur, saying that doesn't prove it. If you can provide a decent reason why you think that way, go for it. But I'm sick of you repeating the statement without countering any of the arguments against it.

The damage roll rules says only weapon die + bonuses The vorpal bonus doesn't get added until you roll the die. You never roll the die - ergo, you can't add vorpal die. You are using the a different definition of maximum damage your attack can do. The flow goes: 1. Hit, rolled a 20 2. Damage...

I agree with robertligouri 100%. Also helpful if you note when you're doing something because you prefer it. That way we don't argue with you over it when it's completely meaningless.

Just wanted to point out that small creatures use medium sized weaponry in 4e.

You can use the offhand lightblade for actual powers while making basic melee attacks with the broadsword. Inefficient, but legal.

Because sneak attack damage gets dealt no matter what your dice comes up as. Vorpal only triggers when you roll dice well, and since critical hits is what caused you to roll well, it could fall under Extra Damage since it's partly triggered off the critical hit itself, since it would only come...

Chill out marick, I don't think it was obvious that you were a new GM. There are lot of rules debate, so our responses are going to be more geared towards the rules answer, which is GM decides. If you wanted advice on what to do in the actual game, I suggest something like: Kobolds: Roll a d6...

You autostabilize out of combat I'm fairly sure.

*Notes Mourn as Pink weapon buyer in costumer registry*