Search results

I'm sure it will be only gnominal effort. :lol:

Personally I'd be horrified if such things filled out the pages of the new DMG, but thats just me I guess. :)

You really need to have that explicitly stated in the DMG? :confused:

Or maybe not! ;)

Here

Well if they change Magic-Users to Wizards, I'm not buying!

He owns Pivotal Games now, the computer games company. Their most recent release is "Conflict: Denied Ops".

Yeah, Bone Hill would be cool. We suffered several TPKs there! :)

Jim Bambra, author of Nights Dark Terror and Blade of Vengeance (and others) is my GM, and he really knows how to tell a story that make a good Game. Some people can tell a story but not make it "gameable", so its a real talent to be able to combine the two IMHO.

Not at all. The question was "will it stop you buying 4th edition?" For me: No it won't.

I was a playtester for that module and it is certainly the best adventure I have ever played in. Its got everything and would IMHO make a fantastic 4e conversion.

"Open" or a normal so-called "Closed" product is irrelevant to me, so I'm going to buy it no matter.

I just keep a note of which monster marked who, on the piece of paper on which I keep the monsters' hit points tallied up. No sweat really.

4th edition long scenarios are running at UK Games Expo, Birmingham on the weekend of 31st May. Go here./

Great to see a new post - really enjoying this story hour!

Thanks for that - the DMG v3.5 is on the shopping list for Saturday ...

Hi, Just upgraded my ancient Monster Manual to v3.5 and I cannot seem to locate Green Slime or Brown Mold in the book. Are they in there? If not, does anyone have 3.5 stats for these old favourites? Thanks

Bump