Search results

For that sentence to make sense is impossible. Because your weight doesn't have a defined automatic set of units. You obviously can't add your weight to damage rolls. It would have to say "the value of your weight in kilograms"

Can you point to 5 other feats that grant numeric bonuses without calling them bonuses? Because your position would make DIS one such feat. If other such feats exist, I'll concede that your position on this subject is reasonable (still can't use a staff as two implements though :p) A staff is...

The surprise round rules work perfectly fine for that situation. The prepared guys get a surprise round (one action each, just like if they had a readied action, but they get to choose what to use it for)

+2[w] suggests it must be added to a pre-existing set of damage. If something has + in front of it, in 4e, it's always for adding to something else.

You're treated as having a weapon (not a staff-implemnt) in each hand. A staff-primary-end is not an implement. A staff-secondary-end is not an implement. A staff as a whole is a single implement. CB has lots of bugs. Note how it says nothing about implements? that's because being a double...

The DM taking it off the board is one way to handle it. The players all pretending that they can't see it is the other way. The first one is easier for the players (apart from cheaters, and who wants to make things easier for them anyway?) The second one is easier for the GM. Sounds like...

Of course, that's all irrelevant anyway, because using Dual Implement Spellcaster with a single quarterstaff was never legal by RAW A Quarterstaff can be a double weapon, which makes it behave as two weapons when used as a weapon. It is not a double implement, it does not behave as two...

If that's a direct quote: Don't worry, it was written wrong. It can't actually work properly if played purely as written. The intent is there, but the writing is just slightly wrong.

No. It doesn't say "an amount equal to the enhancement bonus". It says "enhancement bonus" An enhancement bonus is not a number, it is an enhancement bonus. Do you disagree with this statement: An enhancement bonus is an enhancement bonus] ? Otherwise, when an implement says that you add...

If you're a weapon user you'll never get a flaming weapon because of a behind the scenes game mechanic? If your GM agrees that you deserve the +x bonus, because you would (if you could) be spending money on keeping the implement high, then put an implement in in the CB, shouldn't break anything...

YES! DIS is deliberately made the way it is so that you have to actually keep your off-hand implement up to scratch to get the bonus. Are you keeping your off-hand implement up to scratch? Have you bought a +1 off-hand implement? No. You haven't. The implement isn't a +1 implement. You are a...

Everything you just listed is controller territory, not defender. As for bow-wielding controllers? Ranger (it's the secondary) and seeker. Mostly seeker. The primal flavour on seeker is a bit off from what you want, but if you're willing to go for ridiculously unrealistic feats of...

I suppose the major question is: is domination supposed to make the creature behave as though it's on your side, or as though it is utterly suicidal? ie. if you dominate a surrounded solo, can you force it to make a Ranged Attack against itself?

Enhancement bonus specifically adds to damage ROLLS. No die roll= no damage roll But I am also very interested in what happens with this on a crit, 'cause I'm not currently sure.

A grab ends if you cease being in grab range of the person, whether you do so by walking, teleporting, shifting, being pushed, pulled or slid or any other means. Unless you use a power that allows you to move someone you have grabbed with you. But I'd side with the GM on this one despite...

Yes. They have left their starting square.

Here's one I've just deleveled. May not be perfect, but basic principle: Has two weapons, and has shield (the wonders of the weapon-shield) Knocks people prone when he moves them, which is most of the time. Can knock prone on opportunity attack, and on combat challenge. Doesn't have much to...

I don't think the stance has enough of a downside. +3 to hit is pretty darn big, and most of the time I attack every turn anyway. +3 to hit for a whole encounter, with no downside unless I get stunned at some point? Yes please. I'm not sure how I'd fix it, so this criticism isn't as...

On the issue of him repeating the info you give him: consider writing it down. If he's just doing it to be silly, he'll ask you to go back to just saying the info. If not, give him the written stuff and let him tell the others in character. Why not? Doing this might* actually help with the...

In what way are shuriken better for this than daggers? Enchanting shuriken with magic properties isn't cheaper than enchanting any other weapons. Unlike 3.x, shuriken do not have "ammunition pricing" for enchantments.