Search results

So not converting then, just an entirely different modern system?

I don't really see the point in this? The world 'Game' has a wide variety of definitions including 'a competitive activity played according to the rules' to 'an activity one engages into for amusement'. RPGs don't always meet the former definition for example, but neither do co-op board...

I don't see it as offensive just poorly worded. If you prefer crunchy games, FATE isn't going to suit your mindset, which largely comes down to taste not mental ability.

--DUPLICATE POST DUE TO LAG--

Can't help feel that being a Witcher is the point of this game, all over classes sounds completely secondary.

Ah okay, I get it. Blue Rose was originally based on the D20 edition but the new edition is based on AGE.

What he said. Green Ronin have explicitly stated that it will be based on AGE https://greenronin.com/blog/2017/08/17/press-release-green-ronin-to-publish-the-expanse-rpg/ So really not sure where this d20 variant thing is coming from.

Earlier than predicted! I've ordered from a games store, hope their copies aren't embargoed until GenCon Edit: Then again if shipping mid to late July, they probably won't get to the UK before Gencon

I'm confused. Are people getting upset over confirmed rules or rumours? I've re-read what's officially out there and it appears to be the latter. Hear/read a rumour, extrapolate it to mean something they don't like and then get upset over it.

I got to play in a demo of this as well. Brief history: Played a bit of Pathfinder, attended PaizoCon etc, but moved to D&D 5e when that came out. So, curious about what's happened to Pathfinder I signed up for a demo. And, I really enjoyed it. Combat felt far more fluid than 1e or D&D 5e...

I'd ignore the naysayers and just give it a go. Amazing tales is light enough to not impose any inhibitive structure on the game. Having tried a game with my son when he was 3.5 years I'd say the following: - Sessions need to be really short, 1/2 hour or so - Don't impose much structure...

Anything in particular omitted?

Actually it's spans both! (I've worked in Atyrau on the Ural River, there's a sign saying Europe on one side and Asia on the other)

Hriston, okay I see you what you are saying but interpret the rules differently from you, otherwise let's say you found 200,000GP you would have enough XP to gain multiple levels, riding roughshod over Gygax's fretting over PCs being able to advance several levels in one go. I think either...

So, lets say I'm a Thief at 1237XP and I get given 500XP by the DM. As RAW, my XP goes up to 1251 and stays there until I get trained up to Level 2. So we return to the game next week and I don't find a mentor or don't have GP to level up. At the end of the session the DM awards everyone...

Looks like they rejigged it, link here: http://www.thesecretdm.com/2016/08/diversity-in-gaming.html

I'd be tempted to sign up but I doubt I'd get it to the table soon enough to be of use for them. I quite enjoy the 2D20 system so looking forward to see what they do with it.

One of the things that marks AD&D1e from many other editions are the following rules (paraphrased from the DMG p86): When you receive another XP to level up, you don't automatically level up. Any XP received above the level threshold is lost until you level up. You need to find someone to...