Search results

let's talk about the new stuff! I'm really excited for the new sorcerer! And the barbarian with the bite attack sounds freaky but in a cool way! :D

Oh please, how many more Golden Wyvern threads do we need? Guess i should open one to discuss the 'gold' part of the name, and one for the 'wyvern' part. Yeah, now that i think about it i strongly dislike the wyvernish name of that feat! I mean, what's it supposed to mean anyway? Is it a feat...

Well, here we disagree. Not much to discuss then. It wont help you if yout don't like the names in general. It helps you if you find it to much work to tinker with published stuff like classes, feats or spells until they fit your homebrew. Apart from that, it's not like D&D has ever been an...

What i suggested had nothing to do with experinece but with common sense. I implied that you had to rename things in 3.5 to fit your homebrew, and that's exactly what you'll have to do in 4th Ed. If thinking about alternative names is to troublesome for you, you can always play in a published...

Sometimes i wonder how people played their homebrew in 3.0/3.5... Quick question: Did you manage the unthinkable and change or ignore a name, or did all your homebrew worlds have a Tenser, Mordenkainen, Bigby, Tasha etc...?

I second that! I really hope that the heroic/paragon/epic division will be the only prereq in the books! If there must be any feat chains they should be as short as possible. ^

All that above mentioned factors + lotsa luck ;)

So magic items are actually in the Players Handbook? Interesting.

And how is Shape Spell self explanatory? It hints on the actual use of that feat but you need to know the exact gain nevertheless. I mean, i could think of at least half a dozen other things a feat named 'Shape Spell' could do. Personaly i dislike overly bland names for feats/powers.

I thought it was quite funny too, even if i dont agree on the negative connotation. :)

Just one question: Why are you still here? You've been trolling the boards since 4th edition was announced. Your insulting comments got old real quick.

I second that. Plus, a restricted area on a corporate homepage is not as likely to attract new players to the game as two shiny and well made magazines waiting in several stores around the world. DDI has virtually no advertising qualities.

This needed it's own thread because... there are just not enough!! my hat of D4.0 dryads no no limit

smurfs would rock like nothing else. And we need a tiny race! :D

My money is on the Goblin! With all the evidence we have (Pete Schaefer mentioned a Goblin Ranger, Michelle Carter says the class of the Mystery Race is Ranger, the Mysrtery Race is negatively connotated in Chris Perkins campaign etc.) it seems more than likely. Also, Goblins are iconic D&D...

Forgotten Realms (very excited for the changes) or some homebrew till the new FRCS arrives.

About the +1 sword problem: our group came up with a way of dealing with this stuff in character, we just said "this sword was enchanted once, this sword was enchanted twice" I guess it sounds a bit better in german...:) @Michelle Carters Playtest: I'm pretty sure now that the mystery race is...

I'm excited about core classes becoming interesting and cool again. :D But that's just one thing among many...

My guess is that multiclasing works much like the new prestige class system. Remeber, they said it would be possible to take a prestige class without leaving your own class. Does that mean we won't see any Warlords 10/ Wizards 1?? Will a 10th Level Warlord get any of the lower Level Wizard stuff...

What i find particular funny is that some guys on the Paizo boards start to praise Paizo as a kind of flagship of oldschool gaming, throwing snarky comments and insults against people who are excited about 4th Edition and generally behaving in a grognardy manner, while ignoring the fact that...