Search results

My group has a baby as well. In fact, he has influenced the outcome of dice rolls, while still in the womb. It seemed rubbing the dice on the mother's belly made the rolls come out better (only dad and mom did this ;) ) The only "problem" now is the occasional crying fit (how can something...

I enjoy GMing. I consider myself a good player, as far as figuring things out and using tactics, but there's always my inner GM that wants to step in and exert control. So it's a bit of both, really.

I feel there is no objective way to define Rules-Lite. Way too subjective. It is more like a spectrum, with many different shades.

(long) First of all, I'd like to apologize, not to anyone in particular, for my previous tone. Sometimes I am far too sensitive to statements that sound like someone is saying, "You are playing a game of Let's Pretend wrong." That irks me to no end, but it also does not do me or anyone else any...

To each his own.

Watch out with that logic, there, you might hurt someone ;)

Oh, please. Let's be reminded, in his own words: My opinion is that most people think "rules lite" games are simpler and better because they desperately want them to be, not because they are. How can anyone, in good conscious, not take that as an insulting statement? Desperately? Just because...

My apologies. I used your post to rant on what I feel I have seen in others. No insult intended.

Not the current version, but amazingly, the old version. And so what if that is how "business works"? What's your motive here? Why, when I read your posts (and those of the other so-called "free-market" people, do I get the distinct impression that it pisses you off that people buy from their...

It means that because of those two very limiting factors, a negative will not be statistically significant. Which is fine, unless proving that no one owns their own building is the goal. It doesn't even really qualify to say it's rare, even. Not a big enough nor varied enough sample, that's all...

If it were presented in that spirit, I would agree. However, the bold part of your statement below defies good sense, IMO. Perhaps if you had added, "to that person" it would have made sense.

A hundred. And those are all on a particular website. Ok.

Have at it. No one is telling you what to do. I just don't think Wal-Mart is going to carry Burning Wheel, or CoC, for that matter. :cool:

Ok, it was a not-so-subtle dig on GW. ;) But, it is BIG at my FLGS, and we have a master painter that displays his stuff in a glass case that is at eye level when you come in the front door. I'm sure that has helped. I choose to shop there, but I'll be the first to admit I spend (and have it...

My FLGS is packed every weekend with Magic players and Pokemon. I'm certain that helps things out a lot. As does the high price of GW stuff. ;)

He was responding to this: Attackers usually get it back in spades. Hard to resist, really. ;)

Jesus saves. Feints... passes to Moses... get's the rebound... SCORES! :p

As finished as anyone who has tried to "push a chain" can be. :p

You know, you've managed to tire me out. And all it took you was to say the same thing, over and over and over again, with no proof. Have you considered a job in talk radio? An interview show on Fox News? Because man, you're good. / for the sarcasm impaired OD&D and everything that came after...

Don't be overly biased. Now, it is impossible for any human being to be completely unbiased, so if you like/dislike the product being reviewed, of course you should say so. But don't make that the biggest feature of the review. If I wanted to hear how much the reviewer hated the product, I'd ask...