Search results

Taken out of context. "Spells that provide bonuses or penalties on attack rolls, damage rolls, saving throws, and other attributes usually do not stack with themselves. More generally, two bonuses of the same type don't stack even if they come from different spells (or from effects other than...

Neither do clerics. If you really want to go through the whole mounted feat chain than fighter levels are mandatory. A viable option would be the Prestige Paladin from Unearthed Arcana. Some fighter levels, some cleric and off you go. Could be done with Clr2/Ftr3 or Ftr4/Clr1, enabling to have...

As with damage resistance, it's per attack, not per round. So to hurt a resistant creature, you have to increase the quality, not the quantity...

Erm, your W can see T just fine, that's no objection. The line of sight isn't blocked, so you can still visually acquire most of your target. Soft cover provides an AC bonus to T, but that's of no issue with magic missile. Or else you would have exactly the same problem when you want to charm or...

Miniatures Handbook, Skullclan Hunter. Gains "Divine Strike" at 2nd level, allowing him to sneak undead by infusing his strikes with positive energy. Which probably lead to my confusion above... For a non-PrC mechanic, a Divine Sneak feat would be possible. Lose one turn attempt, sneak undead...

What stacking rules? This is no bonus or malus, it's simply damage. Althought it wouldn't do 4d4, it would do two times 2d4. Important for acid resistant creatures...

Depends on what you mean with "holy". Yes, rules-wise there are lots of options, both paladin and cleric were intended as holy warriors from the beginning. Deciding between both of them is simply choosing between might and miracle. Clerics usually leave you more options for deciding your way...

You got that wrong, if you're hidden that way, you don't have a 20% miss chance, your opponents do.

Right, kinda confused that one. No vitals to target. Suffusing the inner core of their undeadhood with positive energy would be to meta-physical -- in addition to the question why rogues should be of an advantage here. Hello PrC... So one can assume that a evil cleric/rogue sneak-inflicting...

Well, that's what this is about. If you sneak with enervation, your sneak attack causes negative energy damage. If you inflict wounds, you probably cause additional negative energy damage, too. Now, with cure wounds, it can be implied that you cause additional positive energy damage. To which...

Sick idea ;) Just some slight problems: First, a tanglefoot bag isn't a spell. Second, Skip explicitely mentions what qualifies a spell for potential sneak attacks. Tanglefoot bags reduce the dexterity, but it isn't technically ability damage. No use for sneak attacks here. Even a hit to the...

Hmm, any info about Venger? ;)

The target gets -4 to dexterity, he isn't denied his bonus, so nope. Even when his feet are forced in one direction and you're standing behind him... (Should look silly, though.) Good one. Requires a ranged attack, does damage... Seems to fulfill all the criteria. Still, seems rather illogical...

Personally I think that the house rule seems rather acceptable, but with the slight addition that if you ignore the Rogue, then you don't just get an AoO, but he can sneak on his turn. If you can sneak someone when he's severely distracted (i.e. flanked) than you should be able to sneak someone...

What about Permanent Invisibility? Six feet, three and a half inches of it.