Search results

The problem to me is that the pc have bigger numbers but it don't matter because the monster have bigger numbers to, so to me this bigger numbers are useless.

I don't care much about the playtest rules, but if I play it it will be because it is simple, I don't like complex systens as I liked when I had 18 years :-D So if it is d&d simple as savage worlds I can play it.

I think (and hope) that some feats/class abilities will give some bonus but that is it. At level 20 the fighter will have 145 hps or so and he should have multiple attacks, it is enough for the pile of enemies problem.

All but the kender.

Invisibility in 4e lasts 1 round BUT you can sustain it using standard action, it is to me perfect for a non combat invisibility. e

To me is the same, rpg books are better in electronic format.

I use my iPad to play/dm so not only I will buy the ebook intead of the hardcover but also I will probably not buy the books if they are papper only.

Another vote to savage worlds, great game.

I really like the 4e knight defender aura, to me something like that is a good for any one how likes to defend his friends....

It I don´t find the playtest rules horrible I will buy the core books, enven if I don´t use it to play. (if there is a electronic version that I can read in my iPAD, I don´t buy physica RPG books anymore)

Easy - medium - hard is enougth to me, the last thing I want is the jump 3e/4e rules again.

I don't know, reading this foruns I came to conclusion that I don't like d&d that much, I hated ad&d, liked 3e until I played a epic game and like 4e but it is with choices overload to me now. I really like RPG but it is more to me a good way to spend with friends than a way of life or something...

Another hit point discussion? To me hit points are simply 'plot armor' in any edition, a metagaming construct that can be interpreted in game in any way a player want.

A ipad (and android and windows 8) program would be perfect, but at least we need PDFs.

And the OP was complaining that the game is too modern... I find it funny.

Reading what people want discourages me but not because it is different from what I want but because if WoTC try to please everyone 5e will be a horrible patchwork.

I don't know, I like 4e but it became much complicated for my taste, and I have a game that have, to me, the perfect balance between complexity and details that is savage worlds... I certainly will buy the core books and play a little but I'm not liking the things that I'm reading about 5e.

Well if there is a digital version that works in my ipad I will buy it, and is it is simple enough we here will play some adventures, if not I will keep playing savage worlds. We have little time to play and we aren't interested um long Campaigns, generally we play some thing for 10 sessions...

To me it certainly was, when we start with d&d (2e) I though everything wondrous because I could only read the players books and my english wasn't very good...

What I want is that if there is a generalist wizard he should have: Less spell slots (like 2 to 8), no scaling in spell effects by caster level (so a fireball in a 3rd level slot should deal 5d6 damage even if the wizard is 10th level) and no save less "I win button" spell like force cage. This...