Search results

Added! Thanks for stepping up. (If you don't want to run two events, you can drop one. I know it can be a lot of work.) Added! Thanks for being open to diversity, too. We'll see how things fall out.

Only those who have butts. Hehe, "butts".

Can do. Hopefully, once the holiday weekend is over, more folks will start thinking about Gameday and we'll get some more events.

Just figured I would ask. Four + GM is a good base event size.

Hooray!

Thanks for the offer, Reid! I'll take you up on that if need be. What are the odds you can host four players instead of three?

It's always tough when there are event you want to play in slot you're GM'ing, but that's the nature of volunteering. Without GMs to run events, we have no seats to offer players.

Would you consider moving your game instead?

Added! I've also penciled in myself for Monster of the Week.

Added! Added! Nice to finally see us with a balanced roster (same number of events in both slots). Hopefully more GMs will come forward.

Added!

Added!

They all seem like viable candidates to me. I'd run whichever one rocks your world the hardest.

Added! (What turned you off of AGE?)

This may sound like a cop-out, but I'd consider running a beta-playtest manuscript from a major publisher that's tied to a well-known property an exception to the rule. Also, I'm just saying: let's give the published games priority for now, just stand by. I have a feeling we'll have room for...

Fingers crossed! It's been while since you made it out.

I think AGE is the new hotness given the Wheaton Effect™.

I guess now I'm obligated to play. :)

My preference would be WiP, but that's just me. You running Leverage would be cool, though, since you've done work for the line.

Added! Regarding Playtests: For right now, I am going to keep any submitted playtest events in "on deck" status. I brought this up on the FB page, but I want to see if having a roster full of published games (OOP or current) will encourage better attendance. I don't want this to be seen as a...