Search results

I do not think that there are any core rules dealing with this. However, I don't think that stacking poisons is particularly overpowering. The saves are pretty low for a mid to high level character. And the price of poisons is too high for low level character. The DC's do not stack, instead...

As determined by a previous post, these rings are not stacking. Think of them as objects holding spells. Again, I go back to a sorcerer with wand of fireball (level 5 caster). Nothing prevents him from using one in each hand. However, if he was to use one the fireball cast will be 5d6 and...

No, one AoO per opponent per round, regardless of combat reflexes or not. Combat reflexes only allows the player to make AoO against more than one opponent.

Let's take the following scenario: A level 18 druid with 2 rings of animal friendship. The druid can recruit up to 18 HD worth of animals with his class and 12 HD for each of his two rings, for a total of 42 HD worth of animals. Now we know that he cannot have an animal above 18 HD because of...

Oh come on, no other takers?

Usually the same bonuses does not stack with exception of dodge. However, in Master of the Wild, pg 36/ 37, it states "one ring of animal friendship adds 12 HD to the character's limit, a second raises that to 24, and a hand of glory allows the use of a third ring for a total of 36 additional...

You can however counter with dispel or freedom of movement.

Re: Re: Re: Threaten Area & AoO Case Studies I have always played with the rule that you must have a melee weapon armed to make an AoO unless you have unarmed combat feat. So in this case, I would not have allowed the cleric to make an unarmed AoO with a kick. However, that is the point that...

Adding to that, this only applies to a true neutral cleric. For example, a lawful neutral cleric cannot summon a chaotic good creature becuase the opposite alignment rule still applies.

This is clearly not the case here. In my example, the sorcerer moves back 10 ft and casts a spell. He is not hasted, therefore, he is not disengaging. So that means the square that he starts off in is considered threatened and he is moving out of a threatened square (given that the cleric is...

You can only make on AoO per round unless you have combat reflexes. Even if you do have combat reflexes, you can only use one AoO on one opponent once per round. So if a player is fighting a monster with 15 ft reach, he moves in and suffers an AoO. The player then can cast a spell while...

Well, no exactly. PHB pg 122 "If you move within or out of a threatened area, you usually provoke an attack of opportunity. If all you do is move (nor run) during your turn, the space you start out is not considered threatened..." So if the cleric has a mace and the sorcerer is standing next...

Oh is it? Been playing with it since level 1, guess I forgot about that.

This is a flaw in that unarmed attack draws AoO, thus the sorcerer attempts an unarmed attack, and thus creating an infinent loop. Let's say that a fighter is fighting another fighter. The first attacks, fumbles and rolls a natural 1, drawing an AoO. The second fighter takes advantage of this...

Let's say that you have a unarmed cleric and an unarmed sorcerer. Both are medium size with 5 ft reach standing in adjacent squares. Both are unarmed, do not have unarmed attack feat, and not hasted. Please take a look at the following cases: 1. If the sorcerer moves back 10 ft and casts a...

I've already used a steel predator in lord of the iron fortress to break a players +4 frost damage bow. He was not pleased.

You can only use a magical weapon of equal or greater value to break another magical weapon. So can a +2 longsword break a +2 longsword with frost damage? Or would it take a +3 weapon to do so? I have always thought that only the +numeric value counted for this purpose.

I did not take offense at all. When I was asking you guys to hurry up, I was doing so with a smile. You know not to take me too seriously. If there was a misunderstanding, I appologize. As for the wish, I said no stat boost, otherwise same as wish.

I thank you all for taking time to respond. Some of you are right, perhaps I should have warned players about their wishes. However, I did not because I wanted to see what they would wish for. Plus the players were aware of the limitations of wish and how dangerous it was to wish for...

Wow, that is harsh. I'm glad I don't play in your game. :)