Search results

I've thought of something similar: Threat Ranges are now Crit Ranges. Roll within the Crit Range but not a nat 20 and you do maximum weapon damage. Roll a nat 20 and you do max damage +1d6 bonus damage for each multiplier + strength bonus for each mulitplier. If you can only hit on a nat...

Here is a thought: Since combat is an abstraction why do we consider one d20 roll a single swipe of the sword? One d20 roll can count as various minor slashes, almost hits, and exhausting an opponent by making hiim strain to avoid a hit. So my suggestion: If you roll a hit, any iterative...

Midnight!

Armor isn't forbidden it just tends to make them a lot less effective.

While the rest of you are arguing about MAD vs. SAD, the thing that really stands out for me is that the Warlord in HEAVY ARMOR is casting wizardly spells. Could the warlord really be effective doing that?? Or have they changed how armor affects spellcasting.

Because WotC is trying to make it fun for a majority of those who are newly introduced to it. Once they get the hang of it and want to try something a bit more grim and gritty then a house rule or two can get the job done.

Correct, either way works. If that works best for you and your players than that is as good as any other way.

What about providing monsters that are not as dangerous to characters at 1st level? Kobolds without crossbows? What about giving characters xp for figuring out how to avoid combat or xp for discovering something useful or xp for something else not necessarily combat related? If you don't like...

Couple of things here: Vicerious was also causing a lot of headaches over at the Gleemax forums too. I kind of get that he doesn't like the way things are heading for 4e but D&D is a flexible game, if you don't like the current edition of the rules, add house rules to turn it into the way you...