Search results

It is? But wouldn’t the fighter then just use the help action for the rogue and then attack with his extra attack? I don’t remember that being how it worked. Is it similar to the Shove action then?

It’s on one attack only, and it isn’t foolproof. The idea of the thread was learn what buffs there are in the game to make the familiar not die as often.

https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/sprite The stat block attached says that invisibility breaks if it casts a spell or attacks. Nothing about the help action. Invisibility is at the bottom. The issue I have is there are ways around invisibility. The invisible familiar dies easily against...

Help Action isn’t an attack or spell. Invisibility stays up. Flyby Owl has the issue of being killed by magic missile that spell is a guaranteed hit, and invisibility is mimicking it. I also doubt that the party’s arcane casters would want to use up there concentration on an invisibility spell.

The advantage goes away as soon as the familiar dies.

So I have thought of something. Let’s say a kobold had a familiar. Can he have the light spell and have the familiar cast light on his weapons and arrows for him all the time to flavor it as his god/goddess is blessing his arrows? Also RAW Light doesn’t activate sunlight sensitivity.

So a warlock can take Pact of The Chain to get an invisible familiar which against creatures that don’t have a blindsense or truesight means no AoO against them, can’t get killed by Magic Missile and sight based abilities. If you took a level of Cleric or Magic Initiate (Cleric/Artificier...

I know that each warlock subclass is built to have a different use, Hexblades do damage, and Brightlocks are combat medics. Something that’s bugged me about Hexblade is that they get extra proficiencies. Should other warlock subclasses get extra proficiencies?

So if you played Breath of The Wild, there is an item in it were you call your horse to you wherever you are. Is there an item like that in DnD for mount users?

If a rogue is on a mount does that mean as long as they don’t have disadvantage, that there sneak attack is always available because there mount is count as an enemy of who the rogue is attacking?

So if a rogue rode let’s say a warhorse, and sanctuary was cast on that warhorse. Rogue goes in for attack, with Mobile Feat and runs away. The dude does an attack of opportunity against the horse. Dude fails Wis Save. Does this mean he now basically loses his attack, or can he redirect his...

An armblade is a magic weapon that attaches to your arm, becoming inseparable from you as long as you're attuned to it. To attune to this item, you must hold it against your forearm for the entire attunement period. As a bonus action, you can retract the armblade into your forearm or extend it...

But couldn’t any person hide a dagger on themselves? With a quarterstaff someone could “Would you take the walking stick of an old man?” trick that honestly makes sense in the world.

Was there any reason why WotC made it were an Attunement slot was required for an arm blade? I understand if the weapon that is apart of it requires Attunement to begin with, but why does it require Attunement when it’s a normal weapon? Is having your melee weapon not get knocked away worth that...

The idea is that I have a mark of Warding symbol cut into it, since the Artificier is from the House of Warding, but doesn’t know what the house of Warding is, so he leaves that symbol on daggers he makes. I also know that it will stop glowing after a bit, so it’s designed where it stops after...

So I was wondering if an artificier could use there magical tinkering ability to be used on a dagger. As a calling card for a crime he does I was thinking that he leaves a glowing dagger in the ground. Would this work RAW?

I meant by the rules lawyering thing as I am trying to bend rules to get get something out of it.

So if an Ranger used a Animal Companion as a mount since there a halfling, could they verbally command it to take the help action while riding it, since they are in control of it regardless? Sorry if this sounds like rules lawyering.

So I thought of an idea of a ranger companion being a dog that people mistake for a hat when it’s on someone’s head. Probably be a beast of earth from 2019 class variants with a swim speed. I thought it was an odd idea and would there any real world versions of this?

https://media.wizards.com/2018/dnd/downloads/UA_Dragonmarks.pdf Would you allow Greater Dragonmark feat in your game?