Search results

I would love to see them handle off their Psionic works to Dreamscarred Press. The actual likeliness of that is close to 0 but hey a starry eyed man can dream!

Theres still the good chance it's economically successful. I alsl know quite a few folks who dont play GURPS but use the books for other systems.

I believe they can do it for their other stuff...... Which now that I think of it really only extends to WH40k.

I cant say much for adventures but for all the homebrew games I've done and been a part of its very, very, common. However I'm gonna concede that 98% percent of the people I have played with and myself got our start in videogames so it makes sense that it was brought over.

...... You ever consider just letting his character die? I mean if your in do or die game its gonna come up eventually. After that he can roll up a character more in line with the party and alls well. As for why people roll lame duck characters. I think its because they have a desire to be...

Actually a hell of a lot of small indie groups publish online take a gander through DriveThruRPG and you'll see tons of small independent games on there. Like I said before their reasoning just reeks of the same kind companies use when trying to justify DRM. All it really seems to do is annoy...

Most RPG's do not have the backing D&D does. And for those that do they seem to be doing fine as far as I'm aware, granted that only extend to Pathfinder, WoD, Shadowrun, and quite a few things out of Fantasy Flight. As for the argument concerning piracy its like trying to justify DRM not matter...

You know after reading this thread it makes me realize Wizards should really get to making a Unearthed Arcana. With a utter f^89-ton of optional rules for things like upgrading monsters to solo, good guides on creating subclasses, class, alternate systems, etc. Basically a big book that...

Considering how much offense you are takeing to his statement you may or may not be proving his point.

From my admittedly small sample size (I tend to avoid LGS like the plague). 5e is doing. Okay?.... My group plays monthly but its a little hard to tell if we are enjoying 5e itself or just the way our GM runs it. In terms of sales though only 3 people out of the group of the roster of players...

Sort of. From what ive been reading so far it takes some aspects from it. But it feels more like an Inquisitor/Crusader class than what Witchers are which are a hodgepodge of fighter/alchemist with a bunch of bonuses in nature. Geralt also took a level in bard for mad persuasion bonuses.

I like it! It seems fun and its nice to have a class that has alot of meat to it. Which odly is unpopular around here..... Weird.

Kind of disappointing that theirs no Warlock options, you know that class that can MAKE A PACT WITH A DEMONIC HORROR!! Besides that though the spells are nice but once again this one is just disappointing compared to last months.

If the game reaches Level 20 you could just buff the Vengeance Paladins capstone ability in some way or another. Maybe he gains some special abilities for the hour? Edit: I also share your pain with this. Converting Pathfinder classes can be a pain in the a## due to how much stronger they are...

To be fair being a DM is pretty daunting if your not the most creative of chaps if you home-brew and from my experiences its definitely less fun than being a player. Especially if players are anything like my group. Who knew self preservation instincts were so hard to come by?

Generally the only concrete classes we have in games are Paladins. This is also mainly due to the fact that Paladins in our games are structured like Paladins in Pillars of Eternity i.e Pilgrim warriors in service to an ideal or code and their belief being so strong they get super powers from...

I'll admit from the announcement I am feeling nothing but disappointment. Hell it looks like we wont be even going to settings I enjoy until maybe a year or 2. But ultimately if this strategy is working for them I can find no reason to fault them. It also looks like from previous responses on...