Search results

Over all, very nice work. The only one that I don't quite like is ASMODEUS’ COMMAND

it was way too close and had to be fudged.

I for one am glad the players will no longer yoink my dmg so much.

What was the warlock doing in melee range? But I digress, it was a combination of bad luck, poor tactics and the game being balanced around 5v5 not 2v2

On the plus side, it's solid. On the minus side it's mostly cleric clone.

all one handed impro weapons (such as unarmed strikes) are all the same. two handed impro weapons do more.

intelligent items are in the DMG

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=16159216#post16159216

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?p=16102701#post16102701

Punches, Kicks, headbutts, Shield slams, Large trout All the same, well unless you're talking a really large trout big enough to be a two hander

Phb 219

It's in the DMG. There's a no bags of rats rule. Only real threats count.

9x(2d6+Dex) it works with Shuriken but to be fair, it's a daily.

have you tested fighter v rogue yet?

having them match is simply bonus points :)

Sorcerers where wizards with different numbers of spells known/per day. They're an artifact of bards being given a more flexible casting system than wizards. In 4E all classes have the same numbers of powers per day. While WOTC is sure to make a Sorcerer class, the archetype is redundant.

I'm not saying controllers aren't useful. But I'd give up the wizard before I'd give up the fighter or the cleric.

a power source is a single paragraph. The game needed an archer, and I think rangers fit best as martial anyways. The controller role doesn't exist because it's needed tactically (honestly minions are not a real threat) but rather because the Wizard doesn't fit the other roles. Wizards...

Power sources are pure flavor. Having Ki as the power source just means you get to bend physics more than a martial character would be able too. Well I'd say the at wills are ok, but the class features need work.

PHB p 54 monks use Ki