Search results

Well, depends on the dagger. If it has a cross guard of some size and a blade length of 10", then it gets a bit complicated. I would require a sleight of hand check for this. I would allow a player though who declares he hides a dagger (with feasible dimensions) in his boot. I do it that way...

Except the "Whenever" as a preamble makes it totally clear even for me as a non native speaker that a as in any is the meaning.

Your post has a weird distracting thread derailing spin on it .... :P

That is your (wrong) interpretation, a (as in any) is the only thing that makes sense here.

well, your thoughts in the end requires at least one character to be some class capable of magical healing. But what if that one is not available for some reason?

the corridors with stone faces of castle greyhawk, all of them gave you a + on an attribute on interaction, except one which was exceptionally ugly and gave you its look instead with a -2 on charisma

If they would do rapier proper (simulationist) it even would get reach, but you would eventually also need a buckler, main gauche or cloak in your offhand, because it is to heavy to parry proper. (A 15th - 16th century rapier is about as long as a bastard sword and weighs the same also IRL)

A Glaive is very similar to a Naginata which definetely is a monk weapon for me.

I would not allow pam to work with shield, no matter what sage advice or whoever blurts about it. Duelling that's ok with me, but the uber blast my make belief is pam quarterstaff one handed with shield. That is so wrong on so many levels, making a mediocre peasant weapon one of the most...

don't forget 3 stacked kobolds in a trench coat

woodelf

actually from the late middle ages onward which is the best equivalent to FRs tech level, people did a lot of stunning things already. if you can build a pocket watch (1400) a bicycle is piece of cake, yes it would not have rubber tires. In ancient Rome they had hydraulic ballistas, with a...

difficult case here, one thing is you got a player who cares about (official) setting lore (which is a nice thing if the dm is using that lore) and who seems to have stats and skills to verify that mechanically. otoh you spoiled something for the group by simply blurting your maybe ic...

i do not care the least, but some of my players do, so i take care to equalize things a bit (think magic items) if needed

For me as a non native speaker when I first heard the term (without having read it before) I thought of something totally different (think something dirty that really sounds alike) and wondered why they would talk such nonsense on MTV while keeping their face totally serious. I never understood...

O rly? While I might like a game with characters resembling those of LotR, you paint us older guys a bit singleminded. Get the life experience of someone over 50, then you would realize the (absolutely wrong) stereotyping of your rant. I bet out of all characters I played in TTRPGs about 10%...

...casts "Protection from diversity" and "Detect normalized"

Kender?

Well the cannibal halflings are one of the signature DS elements, but if they could form a kingdom? Questionable, it is rather several jungle tribes.

Nope, definitely not. It is best IRL compared to some of the Roman or Japanese emperors, which (besides a polytheistic pantheon of "real" gods) were revered as living gods. Think that minus the pantheon, plus some elemental priests and some druids worshipping nature (aka cosmos) and you have the...