Search results

Not only that, but there's a -4 penalty against anything that doesn't have the humanoid type, and additional -8 penalty for creatures with animal intelligence, and lastly it doesn't work at all against those without intelligence scores such as vermin. I'd rather have Improved Low Blow from...

Book of Who Really Gives a Rat's Ass

Really? Who?

In light of this, picturing a Karmic Strike duel just seems silly. I'll probably house rule, you're only allowed at most one attack for each weapon you're currently wielding for any given "instant."

If only shield bonues stacked with each other...

If you're using the 2WF chain, I recommend all the feats you'd normally take with that chain, except the Two Weapon Defense feats. Other than Improved Shield Bash, and Divine Shield (it did make it to 3.5, but it's in CWarrior and not CDivine as one might expect), there is Double Hit from the...

yes

If polymorph any object is used to tranform the base nonmagical oak club/quaterstaff into anything other than another club/quaterstaff of some sort (e.g. a bowl of haggis), it loses its enchantment. Off topic: I love the example in Polymorph Any Object of "sheep to wool coat" and its...

This thread proves that it needs rephrasing. Can't speak for Doctor Bomb, but because of the way the requirement was phrased, I responded, "no," when the official answer is yes. The ability to perform some specific task requires three things: skill, knowledge, and physical or mental...

Fair enough

Which means the requirement should be rephrased to something like: "Have at least one 7th level slot and the relevant spellcasting ability score 17+" because a 13th+ level wizard with a 16 Int doesn't qualify for the Archmage PrC.

Yes, but how often you use it on your PCs? I've found in general that players treat their PCs with more care than DMs do with their NPCs.

I was referring to Toughness, not Improved Toughness.

You're still using multiple browser windows? I've got tabbed browsing with Mozilla Firefox on my end.

Hold on a sec. I may have been hasty in that response. There is a precedent: the Netherese arcanist in PGtF has the requirement "Able to cast 13th-level arcane spells" and it doesn't list Heighten Spell and Improved Heighten Spell as feat requirements.

No, but if she has in addition the Heighten Spell feat (and of course a 17+ Cha) she could qualify.

What I want to know is why does the ripper and the jovar do the same damage as medium weapons (2d6), but do different damage as small weapons (1d10 and 2d4 respectively)?

Enlarge Person only works on humanoids, so the spell ends (or is surpressed) when your type changes from humanoid. "Creatures do not receive additional attacks from a high base attack bonus when using natural weapons" - MM, page 312, first column, under "Natural Weapons" I think the...

The irony of that limitation is that it was probably designed that way to keep fighters from taking it 18 times (or 19 times for humans and strongheart halflings) in 20 levels.

It'd more ammusing if the sword was trying to commit suicide itself with disregard to the fact it attempts to take the wielder with it. Disco Dancing Whip of Aph Roe Break Dancing Sword of Suicide Line Dancing Mace River Dancing Halberd Lord of the Dancing Claymore (one dance to rule them...