Search results

I agree. I feel like the post was filled with tiny goodies. I would've liked an example of more stuff... but it's enough to make me hopeful. I'm hoping that there's a feat that allows con to be used towards axe/hammer types. The whole... double grouping thing is really sweet. I also like that...

I like that.

Ehh... it's kinda' cool. It's a somewhat sticky-anti-shift enemy. They could make pretty sweet enemies in swarms. This popped up again... (crit 2d6 + 21) Which is basically normal damage + normal crit damage. Any idea if PCs will be able to do something in league with this? I'm guessing (if it...

I'm agreeing with you that running monsters in 4e is a lot more fun. But, I also think being a PC in 4e is a lot more fun. ...would this simply mean that the game is more fun? *Emphasis in quote, my doing.

That is an excellent counter-argument. Guess I'll have to work something else out...

Humans get a bonus @will power at level one.

Hahaha... I don't think so. I don't really have that many. I adapted VBMew to Ken'Sildra Vecundar - an Eladrin wizard who is trying to collect information about the world in its current dark age. Something like a bard-type loremaster figure, but really hasn't come into game. Verys Argul Arkon is...

Awesome! Thanks!

Crits do seem underwhelming, but not as sad as rolling to confirm crit and it not working. I'm thinking of having them do Full damage +Level.... or something along those lines. Any thoughts?

What about playing some sessions w/ pro-4es and open-minded people, and then playing it with that group +naysayers? Has anyone tried that combination?

This is multiple reviews in one! So, about two weeks ago I went and played a 4e demo. It was fun, but the dm didn't really know the rules and only two other people showed up to play. It's somewhere back-logged in the threads. So, last night I convinced two friends to go and check out D&D 4e (I...

I think shifty in bottleneck positions has some pretty great potential. The PCs can only ever get to one Kobold at a time, but they can keep attacking and then shifting into a wide space. ...I'm not sure if that explanation worked... but I hope it did. I love the description of your goblin...

Thanks, that does interest me greatly. I had a, "Ahhh!" moment. Feats are said to be the method to add depth, breadth, or a little bit of both... and that seems to very strongly support that concept. Excellent point. It makes my small fears less afraid, and my hopes a little bit bigger.

Good read, and good English all around. Thanks for the review.

Thanks for the summation!

Hey... the pdfs didn't load when I clicked 'em Anyone else having this problem?

Thanks! I'm glad to hear that's the word on the street. I don't want Roy to come back, use cleave, and then comment on it being a level one at-will power instead of a feat. XD

I agree with most things that you said. A multiclass should not be as good as the main class in doing the things that they do (A fighter who sticks to melee focused feats will rock something fierce melee-style as opposed to a gish who can fight and cast). If there are feats that expand the...

I take it you're pointing out that the ranger could take the power-swap feats. Yes, that would be a viable solution in the long run, but it may not be what the ranger/warlord wants at level 1 to the point of an oddly absurd degree. However, I'm not entirely sure what flaw you're trying to point...

I hope you're right, but it does not currently state that. If it's true, then yeah... rogue training is pretty nice.