Search results

I guess bots are getting better and analyzing forum subject matter for there post content!

Are you familiar with question marks? <==See, there's one right there! Since you were nebulously critical originally, I needed to ask you questions to determine what it is you were alluding to, while refusing to come out and say. You keep hinting that a MC can be "weak" and therefor, what? What...

I believe there's been at least one or two times when I've used disguise self upwards of something like 6-8 times in a single day for my warlock. False life is likely going to be used (at least) as many times as there are battles to be had in a day. That's not nothing. And are you implying...

Did I? Can you cite an example? I'm pretty sure you will see yourself as being incorrect once you take the time to read my post. Didn't you just accuse me of making a strawman? That's especially interesting to me because I'm quite certain I said no such thing. Again, taking the time to read...

Yeah. How many "spell slot levels expended per day" credit is being given for at-will access to spells like: alter self, arcane eye, detect magic, disguise self, false life, jump, levitate, mage armor, silent image, speak with animals, and/or speak with dead? (Did I miss any?)

Your own analysis* above did not seem to imply gimp. So I'm not sure what you are really trying to get at. (*which fails to mention several significant benefits and factors, so I can safely say is incomplete. Or perhaps suffering from confirmation bias, even.)

But you just said you love it. Sounds like you really don't? Or, at least, you are too busy having OPC* envy to let yourself like it, maybe? (*Other Playable Classes)

Define "underperforming". And while you are at it, if you could please explain its practical impact to play, if any. Or, there is no spoon. This is the kind of claims made by folks who go around warning of "traps" hidden in 5e. You know what I mean, terrible choices you can make that ruin your...

Or he can even do both. As a rogue/fighter, he could be an AT and EK.

At the end of the day, he'll be fine. As long as he is following a path that interests him, and keeps him engaged in the character's development, I don't think you'll have any glaring issues. He'll be slightly below par sometimes, a little above others. But 5e is pretty good about "par" and...

Whatever interests you. 5e is good at making whatever that is viable.

I explain it to new players like this: Would you expect to be able to make an off-hand bonus action attack after casting fire bolt? Of course not. In the same way, you are taking the "cast a spell" action when you cast booming blade, or green flame blade. No difference mechanically. It just so...

Whoa whoa whoa. I think you are painting the internet with too broad a brush. You should have specified that your theory only applies to EN World subforums where FrogReaver is commenting on the nature of internet discussions being too corner case.

Wolfman's got nards!

Yeah. Which, to me at least, means working as intended. If it didn't do this, what'd be the point, right?

Huh. That's an interesting perspective. One I wouldn't bet on. I wonder if that's a regional thing? Or maybe more common based on the kinds of RPG systems a group has played?

Its almost no fun when someone makes your argument for you...

IMO, you play a really fun version of the game, that's for sure.

Bless is great. Sometimes. But it doesn't always make everything better. Nor solve every problem.

Other than, as I responded initially to your theory, going the other way? You know, leave?