Search results

Whats your point though, you had plans to release new material under OGL 1.0a ? Old material is fine. Not sure why people think they deserve to release new material under an old license.

Thanks for the clarification... sigh

Are you serious? What is wrong with you lol. omg. you actually wrote that lol.

What makes me laugh the most is that shouldn't wizards be good at telling a story? Like, isn't writing stories their forte? But no, they first try to gaslight us, then try a half-ass attempt to "connect with the audience" by telling the very short story of Kyle, who loves D&D. Now they have...

I am so bummed, I would have paid for that and forgiven them for all their other sins.

It's important to note that "writing by committee" can also have negative connotations, as it can lead to a lack of clear vision or direction, and a final product that is a compromise rather than a cohesive work. chatgbt.

I would invent new mechanics to attack the fans back.

Oh neat, ima grab a hardback off of ebay.

I haven't read yours, I thought you had to buy 5e and levelup expanded on top of it, like adding spells, skills, classes. Was it a rewrite that didn't use the OGL ?

I don't think it is fair to use Maggie Smith's image on all your posts, it really drags her down. I understand you are trying to make your posts seem more adult, but any chance you could change your avatar?

Its not the kind of game I would play. But its the kind of game I would buy just to read, because of the very nice presentation, but I would only want a hard copy. So maybe do a kickstarter later for a print run.

I don't think you understand. Everyone figures they can build a clone of 5e in about 6 months e.g. literally an exact clone, just without the proprietary IP: example: https://www.enworld.org/threads/cool-name-goes-here-community-input-pro-designed.694334/ The creator world has moved on, one...

If 1.1 was exactly the same as 1.0, everyone would still complain, because most people on forums don't want them to succeed :) They want their piece of the pie$ and they can't have it if Wotc succeeds. Its all about money.

Your OGL 1.0a content. Nothing will impact any content you have published under OGL 1.0a. That will always be licensed under OGL 1.0a. Why would they support two OGL's. Everything under old OGL will still be forever under the old OGL, that is reasonable.

If you made 800k and they only too 25% of the (800-750) = 12.5k. 12.5k to license something that made 800k on? That is laughable. And all you do is increase the price a little. Anyway they removed the clause so doesn't matter.

That is quite a step back, I think all the youtubers, streamers, critters, tweeters will go back to forgiving WOTC. Of course rivals will continue to be outraged.

Why would anyone take royalties on profits, most small companies profits are zero... I believe it was royalties only on the revenue over 750k, so not that much at all.

Well then it is not a poison pill. The "poison pill" analogy the Professor Game Master was using, was that OGL 1.1 was soooooo bad, nobody would take it. But they weren't, only a few people make over 750k, and they can easily afford to raise their price to take royalties into consideration.

Someone said they Wotc has licensed Matt Mercer's image and voice so the AI DM will appear more friendly than your usual DM.