Search results

Nice with some PF1 content :)

I was actually just thinking about this. We are some 5e'rs starting a PF1 campaign soon (Rise), so I'm quite curious to know what constitutes a good party composition in this game. Gonna follow this thread :cool: So a healer is important I gather. How important is the magical "oomph" as...

Exactly. I ran ToD last year on Roll20. Granted for totally new players, so that might factor in, but we all had an absolute blast. There will never be an adventure that'll be perfect for all groups, but for our little group where the players were new it was awesome. And yes for a group of very...

A bit pedantic, but that isn't entirely correct. It's an increase of 3 percentile points, or 21%.

Mike Mearl's guide to Dungeons

I pretty much stopped reading DnD stuff on twitter. People are so aggresive, angry, black-and-white-ish. Intolerance all over.

This is such a no-brainer. I have just been waiting for Wizards to do this. It's the next logical move in 2012. If they don't do it, at some point someone will leave them behind in the dust. They botched the vision in 2008 with 4e (unfortunately). In a way they were a bit ahead of times those 13...

Ok I would totally want such a product. So big thumbs up from here.

I was referring to this one: Let's Read Scales of War I don't think the dude ever got through it though.

RPG.net had one of these "Let's read" with Scales of War, which I read not long ago. Some of the episodes seemed quite great actually.

It is not just about the HP bloat, it is also something inherent in the 5e's encounter design. It is not very inspiring compared to 4e honestly. I know as a DM that is also "our job", but it would be nice if the adventures also covered this a bit more. In that regards I find 4e encounters much...

No, I can totally appreciate that. Unfortunately if they don't consider accessibility a feature. Sorry to hear that.

I agree one of the things not terribly good in FG is the output in the chat window. R20 can do more in that area. But pretty much all else are better it seems. R20’s sheets system seems so archaic and the 3.5 are almost unusable compared to FG. Also why are they a garbage company? Really curios...

Why the FG hate? What am I missing? I am evaluating it for some 3.5 and I really like it. The FG 3.5 sheet is 1000 times better than Roll20 ditto. But I notice a lot of displeasure toward FG and am wondering what I am missing.

Interesting. I know that here in Denmark a company is working on getting the three core books translated (currently only the Starter Set has been translated); and I have been told that getting the final agreement with GF9 in place has been almost impossible. So yeah something is going on. I...

I actually liked this thread, before it was derailed to be about CapnZap, who the "derailors" then declared to be a troll. I own the CRB and the Beginner Box - and currently play 5e. There are some stuff I like about PF2, but I also see quite some issues. Hence I like reading these threads...

Yikes. How racist of you.

Yikes. That’s judgmental.

I get nothing but good vibes from Perkins and Crawford. And I have no reason to not trust those vibes. And yeah, even from where I'm located (Northern Europe), the question is: is an evil Canadian even possible?

Getting back on topic, I really like James' work, so this is a great move from where I'm sitting :) Now I just want Rob Heinsoo back as well.