Search results

Time to open up the Warlord sub-forum again? ;)

I can't imagine why the current 2014 rules would ever be called "the 2016 rules", so I would agree; please only do that when absolutely necessary :p

Most are settling for the "2024 books" or the like. The old books are the 2014 edition.

Thanks. Just tell the OP that if they don't want their discussion derailed by naming questions they should probably spend the minimal effort required to learn what the name is going to be. Hint: it isn't 5.75

5.75? What are you talking about?

This is not intended as a dig at Goodman specifically, but, man, have I seen this insincere spin before, where the company is trying to pretend it isn't about abandoning the good traditional forum model. What I mean is that whatever direction they're moving in you can be sure there's no...

To keep my post brief, I think the game rules should give Dungeon Masters options to choose between, rather than making the choice for them. In other words, a full and complete ruleset would include rational and balanced pricing of magic items, but also say it is up to the DM and the party to...

Sure. But still - WotC will have made sure enough of the 2024 content is plain better than it's 2014 counterpart, so it's not really that I blame them...

Morris can't be expected to instantly react to every little change that comes from general Xenforo updates. The time when EN World aspired to service their own customized forum software is well and truly over. Just because something is low priority does not mean never. Besides, this should...

Selling us what we already have is the primary driver for this project.

Don't worry, the will have changed around enough little details to make it a chore to use the old books, and to ensure most of us switch over. If only to escape our players whining "but I want the new version of [insert subclass|feat|spell|other class feature]!"...

Try taking off that tin-foil hat of yours, you might actually like it.

"Race" in the fantasy sense has ALWAYS meant species. Tolkien NEVER intended elves and hobbits to merely be varieties of the same species in the way "caucasians" and "asians" are here on Earth. Of course that has never stopped fantasy fans from allowing (or encouraging) cross-breeds like...

No. No sequel, no returning to London, Mariko remains dead. All just a dream.

Yes. Lots of elses! This was extremely brilliant.

Both https://www.enworld.org/threads/wotc-president-cynthia-williams-resigns.703723/ and https://www.enworld.org/threads/do-you-plan-to-adopt-d-d5-5one2024redux.702682/ are threads started by Morrus (who obviously starts more threads than most people around here). Here are a few other threads...

This is a brand new idea and nobody has ever attempted something similar. ;)

The person starting the thread likely has put you on Ignore, or vice versa.

Wouldn't it use Black Eye rules then? ;)

Yes, a 2e (or 3e or 5e) scenario can totally consist of combat only, but you appear to know what I mean