Search results

If you are wielding an implement in each hand both implements get any inherent bonus you got. But for "Dual Implement Spellcaster" to work you really need to have two implements (though they don't need to be magical by themselves if you got an inherent bonus), it isn't enough to wield just one...

Fargo is a character on the SyFy series "Eureka". My guess on the game: It's just regular 4e D&D You can see the top of the essentials style character sheet and the spell used "Fountain of Flame" is one of the newer wizard daily powers introduced in the Red Box/Heroes of the Fallen Lands.

You might want to try Javascript Dungeons and Dragons 4th Edition Character Generator But this "sheet" won't give you any details like the normal sheet from the character builder does (the CB sheet can be used without ever having to consult any books during the game)

You may only use Con instead of Dex/Int, not use Con AND use Dex/Int (if only to replace it by the +2 from Expertise) Let's recheck your logic: Hide Expertise: +2 (A) to AC instead of Dex/Int (B) with Hide Armor or short: A instead of B Sentinel: Con (C) instead of Dex/Int (B) with light or...

Just started it the first time. "Installation" was a no-brainer (just extract the archive into any directory - it now has a "permanent" place in my "4e" subdirectory of my "rpg" directory) Runs surprisingly fast and stable (.NET 3.5 is already installed due to the old "offline" tools from...

Do you still need more testers? BTW: Any plans to also include "Monster Cards" from the Monster Builder or other sources?

Since the Character Builder still can't use houseruled stuff (or did they update it without me knowing?) has anyone made any own cards for the stuff that can't be done with the Builder? Things like: the paragon paths, the living blade, cards for "Song of the Forms" (and the other new powers), ...?

BECM (but not I IIRC) were translated into German as was every Edition of AD&D and 3.x (including the inofficial "3.75" Pathfinder ;) ), but only the 4e Core Books (PHB, DMG, MM) were translated ever before WotC didn't renew the contract with the German publisher (afaik WotC wanted to find...

(Deleted Double post)

I don't know of Weems Fate Cards, but if you just need the complete text of the cards there's a Thread at WotC

Everything that adds to damage. Just remember that all instances that add to damage rolls won't add anything (unless specifically specified) as there's no damage roll.

Thanks, that helps a lot. Other DMs who have already run it in 4e are still welcome to chime in. Another thing I noticed: Indomitability's Boon (via Death Boon) is granted "until it is used or until the end of the next extended rest" Is this intended? After the next extended rest there's...

After almost 3 years of hiatus we might "continue" the War of the Burning Sky. Back in 2008 we played the 3.5 version untill adventure 5, which got horribly shortened due to the fact that the whole group wanted to start with 4e as soon as possible and we haven't touched any 3.x stuff in this...

I was running Iron Heroes for a while before I started WotBS (3.5) and decided against using IH with it. While the special abilities of the IH classes can make up for the lack of magic items/spells from the PCs, WotBS is a REALLY magical setting. Almost everyone important (and certainly all of...

Strange... I can't find any trace of this download in my RPGNow account. I take it the discount was sent somewhen around march 27th this year?

When and how did the discount get to the subscribers? As a simple mail (then I'm sure I haven't got it anymore) or was it sent as a download file (then I'd like to know when that came so I don't have to check all my RPGNow orders/downloads) Thanks in advance.

No. This houserule would disallow the use of Take 20 to open locks (because you can't use Take 20 with rolls that have negative effects if you fail). Besides... this houserule would also make lockpicks VERY brittle, as even a grandmaster lockpicker (Open locks +30) would break a lockpick for...

Section 6.1 of the current GSL (at http://www.wizards.com/d20/files/GSL_20080617.pdf ) states: " 6.1 OGL Product Conversion. If Licensee has entered into the “Open Gaming License version 1.0” with Wizards (“OGL”), and Licensee has previously published a product under the OGL (each an...

Wasn't there something in the GSL that forbid you to "update" OGL content to GSL and still keep the OGL product available?

The d20 license already expired but it should be easy to "rebrand" Burning Sky with just the OGL (if that hasn't already happened) But if the GSL shouldn't change till next year there won't be an OGL Burning Sky anyway because once the GSL version is out there can't be an OGL version out, too