Search results

Might have something to do with having to ship things across the pond...

Okay, based on this, then you can't refer to a Dngeon Master right? is that why other books use game master? But don't you have to use the latest STL? So isn't this now a violation?

well, this will be his first time GMing of any sort, so challenging is probably not what is being looked for. In fact, cliches abounding might make it easier to get a handle on the game itself for him. who does dawnforge?

well, quite a few more supplements, and a different way of looking at things from D20 modern. But if you want cybernet as a D20M supplement, it might work to some degree that way... Still it is currently only a standalone product.

Ummm, hi... I doubt you know me, but I assume your WotC tag and picture are supposed to make you recognisable... Am I correct?

I saw diaglo and expected an OD&D rant. :) Oh, I thought of some, but not sure how 3.5 they are. Freeport (GR) Oathbound (Bastion)

Okay, opening it up a bit, what about 3e settings that are still being supported by new 3.5 products?

I find that sitting and writing down what happened in a list form straight after the session is the best way to remember what happened, then I can write it up a few days later... The points remind me what happened. Usually writing it up triggers more memories.

Okay, my friend is thinking of starting a D&D game, and we've played other d20 games, but not D&D, so could people please list the settings out there that are 3.5 (or have conversion documents) and are still currently being supported. Also, if it is being published, can you only put in things...

it's always inside, you can see it written in as '1st printing' or '2nd printing' usually jsut under where they put the credits in.

ah the delusions of youth. :) Just kidding. I hope you succeed, but on the other hand, don't hold your breath...

yeha, well, I thought they might make a 3rd product for 2004, but the history of 2003 shows they only did 2 d20M products last year, and suggests that might continue as the trend...

yeha, well, I thought they might make a 3rd product for 2004, but the history of 2003 shows they only did 2 d20M products last year, and suggests that might continue as the trend...

Well, if you're willing to wait, apparently mongoose is going to release OGL wild west with fully optional supernatural rules. Matt Sprange spilled it in their forums, but he didn't say when. It also doesn't appear on their release schedule yet, but it came from the horse's mouth, so...

go crossgender when you roleplay. :) That's a bit different, especially if you know you're a bastard and treat women like rubbish. :) Hehe, except now I'm reformed... but it still makes you think. Either that or do in character diaries to write up your sessions and try to think what your...

Seems there are some pretty clear trends though. The stats that are universally needed are Dex for AC, Con for HP and Int for skill points, each of which are important to make your character mroe versatile and hardy... The rest seem like they're based on favourite character concepts...

yeah, I realise they are all important, and that different people play different types of characters. But I guess I was mostly asking if people found they played any particular type of character more, and as such they leads to high and low stats... I mean, I don't even play D&D, so my reasons...

I would say that it's for the revised edition, otherwise they wouldn't be 'releasing' it, since it's already been released. The date now says 2004 when I jsut looked...

yeah, but still something usually gets put down for the greater good? Do you play any class/character type more than others?

any predictions on which will come out top? I mean, do you think that the demographic here is more inclined to play one type of character?