C. Baize said:
Well. There are certain people who refuse to use anything unless it is by WotC. Many of those consider WotC to be the only "Official" product out there.
And that's valid for them.
I know. The same applies to
D&D gamers who only buys Wizards' product.
That is sad.
C. Baize said:
They're unnecessarily limiting themselves, and missing out on a lot of truly stellar products, but that's their choice.
No need to insult their choice.
Didn't mean to. I just thought that this community is a lot more open-minded than other communities that enjoy
D&D-bashing and pride their game and only their game as being the better. I mean it's bad enough that they're saying
d20 is not good for this genre or that. It's worse when our community think that only Wizards can do
d20, when you got the more creative yet former Wizards designers doing things better (no offense, Wizards, even though you rely more on freelance writers) as third-party
d20 publishers.
If only I can find some silver lining in such a dark cloud... Ah, yes. The Game Mechanics, already out with
Modern Player's Companion, Martial Arts Mayhem, Modern d20 Screen, etc. Then there is RPGObjects with their
Blood & Relics, Blood & Guts, Blood & Vigilance, etc.
Back to the topic...
AFAIK, there is no plan to make setting sourcebooks for the other two
d20 Modern campaign models presented in the core rulebook.