Search results

how can it be both a trap and a tax????

I would hate to see cha or con attacks, and Int is far from my idea (although I guess for a concept or two it might work) I think that a zen combat that focuses on perception and inner eyes... yea Zen combat would be a cool sub class feature for a monk... use wisdom instead of str or dex....

what is melee training? I know the words, but in this context I can't make any sense

wait... Tony Vargas is this true? because if you aren't even playing the game why argue?

you don't get to ask for errata to the PH and it is never going to happen so just choke that up to a lost cause the best you could hope for is a new book (most likely next year) that has a warlord in it... asking for more then that is a joke

the problem is that hitpoints don't work... shhh it's a secrete... but they have stood the test of time because we as players don't like change. (By the way both pro and anti warlord fit that bill) so we argue over other things and ignore that HP is silly and serving too many masters...

your not waiting, you got your answer Battlemaster +feat with maybe some bard refluff... that's it... now you can include the new rouge mastermind... take 3 levels of rogue and 4 of fighter, take the inspire feat... boom your warlord...

whats the matter with "As an action you can make an ally spend a hitdie and get a bonus equal to your CHa, this is a supernatural ability that doesn't work in dead or anti magic fields..." no exceptable at all no class has gotten that and there is no reason one should now what about the...

second wind, hit dice, healing over night, short rests, and battle master fighter are all comprmises... so is the inspired leadership feat... your turn

the comprmise was group A wanted fighters to just be normal warriors, group B wanted extraordinary abilities with cool downs, group A wanted NO INPSERATION HP, group B wanted inperation HP... it is just enough that no one is happy...

the problem is there already was a compromise... a battlemaster fighter with that inspire feat already is a comprmise that no one is happy with, now the pro warlord people want MORE

If they came sized for my bones and D&D minis I would have ordered 3 bags... but they would be giants on my board :(

SO I'm new here (I lukred a bit but wotc shutting there board brought me here...) so I'm now asking for some help in rules/campaign building So I DM a two Fridays out of the month, I have 4 players most of the time, and they are about 10th level (just a few thou away to be honest.) and I have...

the problem is zombies aren't scary in D&D

yes, because someone trained to warp reality should have the advantage....

I honestly would be happier if battlemaster hadn't been a thing, but I'm dealing with it... now I just hope we never see more of the warlord (but that new rouge looks like it's going there)

the objection is that once you include rules for non magic cheer leading to heal you make it so that people who play the game are unhappy and 1722 posts latter you are no better then at post 1, it is to dividing and as such there is no good reason to have this fight

+1 don't put it in a book just make up your own...

no, here is the thing... you bring up 'some people might not like X' to respond to 'more people dislike Y'. The problem is that you want to change the argument. Our argument is "Hey, we don't want warlords messing up D&D" and your pretending "Well clerics or monks or warlocks already mess up the...

go start an anti monk thread, you will get more discussion then the anti cleric one... but still not as much as the anti warlord one...notice the major diffrence