Search results

Creatures (including lore) should fit on no more than 1 page IMO. Brevity is the soul of wit, after all. :) If you need more space than that, you are just being superfluous. 🤷‍♂️

There is no such thing as problematic content IMO. You might like it or not, sure, but that doesn't make it a problem. I might not like something, but that doesn't make it problematic or wrong, it just makes it something I don't like. To each, their own. Please stop trying to force your morality...

The ones I succeed on... ;)

Yeah, but the Ghost has STR 7 (-2) while the Invisible Stalker has STR 16 (+3)... ;)

Indeed! :D

Did a quick search without seeing anything relevant, so here we go. 1. I know grappling is a skill check and not an attack roll (I disagree with the RAW here, but that is neither here nor there). 2. I know Invisible Stalkers are immune to the grappled condition. So, my question is, can an...

Bargle is innocent. Patrons in the tavern at Threshold heard Aleena ask Bargle to help her and Huxley in the abandoned caves. The two left together, and Huxley followed nearby when he saw them leave together. On their way to the caves, Aleena hinted that there was only enough treasure for two...

Both are typically modules I run for every group I organize. KotB is my introductory adventure and AtG is for higher levels of course. :D

Since I won't be seeing the movie in all likelihood, I won't be doing it. :D

Really? No Against the Giants...? :-( It is one of the quintessential adventures in D&D history IMO.

Yes, I am ready for a new version. I would like a D&D that makes more sense and is more coherent.

Which is why I always thought as a feature for a particular subclass, sure; but not for the class in general. However, IMO it ultimately depends how the game views creatures like the owlbear or pegasus or griffon, etc. Do they bear young and raise them? Or are they just created by magic...

How's this? Or if you want more blue: Just some quick work, the OP can do better certainly but these might work for you.

Huh... funny, I haven't heard about that. Sounds like another idea from the past or stolen from message boards. I know a long time ago we did you actually have levels of Exhaustion equal to your CON score and each level actually reduced your "temporary" CON score (resulting in lost HP max...

Sure, but HP are also finite for Casters... who have fewer of them in general. ;)

I agree 100%. It has never been a problem for me or any group I've played in, either. Back to the thread topic.... Casters make attack rolls often with their spells, and if it does really bother people, granting targets advantage on saves vs. spells at 3 levels of exhaustion COMPLETELY levels...

This topic comes up a lot. Here is our current version: I like this concept, and I might suggest a variant to my group Saturday. However, I would do something like 1d10-3 levels of exhaustion (7 levels for us = death, 6 is unconscious). So, there would only be a 1/10 chance of "instant death"...