Search results

Well, that's a tad ham-fisted, I mean, what sort of "classometer" are you going by?

No, I applaud their cagey/cautious approach, right on. Something odd happened along the way, during 3rd Ed, something gross.

That sounds fortifying, Black Bolt, ain't, no goddamn mutant, within human circles.

I'll give you Warlord, as it was a class in a PHB 1, but there has never been a Psionic class in a PHB 1, psionics is an appendix in the 1st Ed PHB, that can be applied to any character. Maybe a Psionic Feat should have been included (I remember them mentioning an Awakened feat, early in the...

Ah, very good; if who says what? This seems analogous to the DM ruined my early D&D career-deal, we see. Some have obviously had major problems with d-bag DMs, and d-bag players.

Well, let's not get hysterical, Martin Short stole Father of the Bride, the latter is very substandard Steve, the last good Steve movie was Bowfinger.

Yeah, I started with 1st Ed in 1986, and moved onto each new edition as it came along; 5th Ed for me is like the 2.5 I wanted back in August 2000.

I think the days of D&D as we knew it, are gone. I am digging the new approach, though, nice and cautious.

Yeah, hobbits on meth.

Tracking ammo seemed standard back in the day, there are even ammo boxes to tick off on some pre-3rd Ed character sheets.

Hahahaha, I see a kenhad coming!

Except for those cheeky, spelljamming/portal jumping ones!

You thought correctly.

How do Proficiency Dice work for monsters with a Proficiency Bonus of +7 to +9?

"I was drugged and left for dead in Mexico and all I got was this t-shirt." is one of the best ways to go.

Ah, now you've reminded me of the Holy Slayer, the 4th Ed Avenger is known for wielding airplane-wings.

Yeah, and if you swap Cha for Wis, suddenly the character has it's two highest scores in two of the most common saving throws, and both apply to their AC, all while wielding a heavy weapon (sort of diminishes the monk).

On the topic of no armour, I would like a cleric with no armour proficiencies, a more cloistered deal, or Moses type.

Tediousness aside, at least we now know where the new UA article is, pretty cool, I am now looking into a spell-less Paladin.

Yeah, at this point a fifth FR campaign book/boxed set or what-have-you seems kind of pointless. I like where D&D is now, so much material from the different editions readily available. You really can make it the game you always wanted at this point, what with 6 versions, mash up what you like.