Search results

I disagree, Wayne Reynolds makes fantastic art and I'm glad he's still their main artist.

I like it!

I believe their ability is in addition to the normal rules for heightening spells via the feat.

I'll check out the free PDF. After playing 5e for a few months I'm already bored with it so this might be a good alternative.

Collector's editions? Another hard pass for me. Gotta say these latest 5e releases have been a boon on my bank account. Wake me up when they get to psionics or Dark Sun.

Hard pass on MToF, this and the other FR one.

Same here. I had it on pre-order when it was first announced, then as I read more and more about it, I grew less and less interested in it. I finally cancelled my order about a month ago. After reading this overview I am very happy that I did.

Holy crap that's a pricy set!

I agree, not a fan of the bobble-headed halflings, and the tieflings shown aren't very well drawn either. I bought Volo's and Xanathar's but I'll be passing on this one for sure.

I agree, not a fan of the bobble-headed halflings, and the tieflings shown aren't very well drawn either. I bought Volo's and Xanathar's but I'll be passing on this one for sure.

Meh, I'll wait for the PDF and save my money for the hardcover of the final rulebook next year.

IMO the elemental clerics are a better fit as warlocks. Elemental clerics were limited to their elemental sphere for spells, with minor access to the Cosmos sphere (where most of the regular cleric spells were). Warlocks have a relatively limited list of spells too, with specific spells granted...

From what I have read so far, monsters and NPC's will not use PC rules for creation. Which means you could potentially have a Level 1 NPC blacksmith with Legendary proficiency but only a +4 modifier.

Lord Shark's take on it was mine as well. Basically, no ability score damage in PF2 is the takeaway. There hasn't been any talk that I've seen about dealing damage yet.

That's true, but unless I'm missing something, Spelljammer wasn't that popular was it? I never played it myself, too goofy looking. These were the results of the setting survey they did last June: "The popularity of settings in the survey fell into three distinct clusters. Not surprisingly...

My guess about the new setting for D&D is that it won't actually be Spelljammer. If history has taught us anything, it's that the presence of a single monster in a book does not preclude a new campaign setting being released. We don't have Dark Sun yet but there are Thri-kreen in the Monster...

Hopefully not Spelljammer. That's the one setting my friends and I had zero interest in.

I'm thinking this is a reference to 5e's bounded accuracy mechanics. As we all know, PF1 had a diminishing return on pretty much any low-level ability, spell, monster etc. once you got close to level 10. A huge portion of the game basically became obsolete and non-threatening. I'm assuming this...

If Pathfinder 2e moves in the same direction as the Starfinder rules, it could prompt me to switch from 5e. I enjoy the simplicity of 5e and hate the complexity of Pathfinder 1e, but I love the huge amount of customization options available in Pathfinder. IMO, 5e is "good" but there are a few...

I'm into Abercrombie and Erikson myself. Glen Cook's black company was a good read as well.